Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53223C636CD for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 11:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231879AbjBJLNj (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2023 06:13:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53742 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232043AbjBJLN1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2023 06:13:27 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD20C72DEE; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 03:12:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id g18so5265886qtb.6; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 03:12:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hyp8ZmbrcaG2ABsoThk0gEpJR9SiIpSS9II2WcwajGc=; b=f8QxVlEI4ckz8hH+Kkatx5E3WtW9JYGgmYgFj1GWpc1YkcBkPHER7me0S/MTAYqSFM ixsYKKg7nX4YBuQF9yDfrwZ6gEgxyu3y4vKYfwBGWBioawJqhfaS4bkyoMt7bN0rKF0A rxL4KAIRvRLe8iWu2HiJJt1TohtwJu8uM3BUoNuY2LYRpisj+iRH8sVS+3XzB94Tv2D+ mIhIvCt2Lc1nbE1IYmZeFLGt446ZIDhNPUMojoSWYFMQBNAr0MQ15j6htFehCOn89fFy TNhl7H2QhkBA0G2ibkYjsBL2KN+cJPgPpJj84/Caa0VFD91yDwcMnClRHT5aEv4BluC4 NdtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=hyp8ZmbrcaG2ABsoThk0gEpJR9SiIpSS9II2WcwajGc=; b=RQr6eJ/2TBi9lP+Fu5h4euW8GwttFC3KvxD7pAZtDZ1pi99NucFNWTLY4V2tIBTau0 jEKAF5UkEjUh+Wd6eFUm9hsmoiGAnqy37AHeHLu93kNSL+pdXUyEqQS6nvJjhAdv+KO6 /wWv3h4u5UHQ3ujVukC99YYTXTslxUg5lhgUXeVU1VHnpWgtF1o9awSk5KtmvPYlPFOq XoQ+vwE1nTmW0YSbjANUrtAlY4HWBQehhMpcXxj7UJmAZg7rHDOcv/aMj+4qpmwsozQR peqjdK2LN7e7ylKud8aMICHRthsj2n/KQIKJgIn2W51XasTJSrZm4iPPwM8oGkJ9wIHR HmsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWV/u4RuAQABmjLk3lugqoiW4YrpgHBOGOBDBGj45AJOuRO7/dv AAvyix16HWe27NMrt5KRLGkr5cHOdW1Kd4WZQH8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/P6I/oQ7XCsnc8nl7vtWaYchdN/on5pNFGQ+JfZpvZcD5o+v20X+ZhePgHGyOUBRrrQpJpsE/fYjKyo8Y0XqQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1456:b0:3b9:a4ee:be1c with SMTP id v22-20020a05622a145600b003b9a4eebe1cmr2236798qtx.391.1676027562850; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 03:12:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <57D52CFB-228D-4071-94CB-D32883BF872A@live.com> <20230210214737.2ef942c6@redecorated-mbp> In-Reply-To: <20230210214737.2ef942c6@redecorated-mbp> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Touch Bar and Keyboard backlight driver for Intel Macs To: Orlando Chamberlain Cc: Aditya Garg , Jiri Kosina , "jkosina@suse.cz" , "benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com" , Andy Shevchenko , LKML , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "ronald@innovation.ch" , "kekrby@gmail.com" , =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Orlando Chamberlain wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:41:07 +0000 > Aditya Garg wrote: ... > > > Quick observation. Do you miss the Co-developed-by: tags in the > > > patches? > > > > Most of the changes are minor in the 1st and 2nd patch, we haven't > > changed most of the code. The changes were written as per the > > documentation given in > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/maintainer/modifying-patches.html > > > > Do you think a Co-developed-by is still required? > > > > The third patch was actually written by 2 people, so there is a > > Co-developed-by there. > > > > To add onto this, for patches 1 and 2, as we haven't been able to > contact the original author (Ronald), I think the only ways we are > allowed to make changes are either doing them in separate patches, or > with the [name : changes] tags. For the latter I thought you had > to do a Signed-off-by after it, but given the changes aren't just to > make the patch apply on a newer version, do you think the > Co-developed-by tag is also needed? I'm not insisting, just asking :-) So, if you think it's not needed, fine to me! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko