Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756584AbXIEMef (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:34:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754204AbXIEMe2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:34:28 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]:21045 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753984AbXIEMe1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:34:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Y0JK8xQVYKCU9la0hgICOl1HqSnjQRkcvHe0TZTuZLRrz3P+4E4DO/6/K0S1eaRxGp6vg7EnQPkTdtpihwRyUnQPQy0nVUcnYIfpg8KyuFriJWWycYwivLpHLArQKepx4tfBkz/i7anceBOSHJEyvesrHNXZGF8UF34R29XnuHw= From: Denys Vlasenko To: "Daniel J Blueman" Subject: Re: file system for solid state disks Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:34:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: "Jan Engelhardt" , "Richard Ballantyne" , "Linux Kernel" References: <6278d2220708230155j18248f2cr3cc697a7acbaa930@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6278d2220708230155j18248f2cr3cc697a7acbaa930@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709051334.14599.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1208 Lines: 31 On Thursday 23 August 2007 09:55, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > On 23 Aug, 07:00, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Aug 23 2007 01:01, Richard Ballantyne wrote: > > >What file system that is already in the linux kernel do people recommend > > >I use for my laptop that now contains a solid state disk? > > > > If I had to choose, the list of options seems to be: > > > > - logfs > > [unmerged] > > > > - UBI layer with any fs you like > > [just a guess] > > > > - UDF in Spared Flavor (mkudffs --media-type=cdrw --utf8) > > [does not support ACLs/quotas] > > Isn't it that with modern rotational wear-levelling, re-writing hot > blocks many times is not an issue, as they are internally moved around > anyway? So, using a journalled filesystem such as ext3 is still good > (robustness and maturity in mind). Crap hardware (one which only _claim_ to do it) is out there, and is typically cheaper, so users preferentially buy that ;) -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/