Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BDFC64EC7 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 16:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229588AbjBKQoq (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Feb 2023 11:44:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46316 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229479AbjBKQop (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Feb 2023 11:44:45 -0500 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net (relay11.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED4AC1E1FA; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 08:44:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52B06100002; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 16:44:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1676133881; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=M+0DC+ETxm+24yPbZcgcwTKulTh6wEH0nAaak4Rv5+s=; b=geR+dOxyvNCD8U3nIQqUf9YODnmp6BJmOOwyPFXZL6w260h+RbQ4kVyeKwoHc0XPzZT3h5 sYF48Ix3xTygNLn72UC/y8PPBm/1rhfyZw2l23g+2V4p5WVhh+/P5PDOwz+VrHyk4Wj2CK sSWpdg2R6HEVyyKEIv1bDAhCXoDAEnLVpwm4oJE60ZTglsQoEsgObXLd5jAI7q/4YmZXT4 Lq4sXQ7sFn12X3pPtvU0sFdCi22q1X0OPO58+F33n3ntBvZscNEkGIBMk1RzVBKtVlMTcb jsU+5uZ7w3RUmpsAzx8QZzc6pSenTAbHncuSwUallZ0C5ZuVwcJ+jqx6Vn7gWw== Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 17:44:39 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Johan Hovold Cc: Johan Hovold , Bjorn Andersson , Andy Gross , Konrad Dybcio , Alessandro Zummo , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Maximilian Luz , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/22] dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: add nvmem-cell offset Message-ID: References: <20230202155448.6715-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org> <20230202155448.6715-17-johan+linaro@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/02/2023 09:22:54+0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:48:08PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 02/02/2023 16:54:42+0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > > On many Qualcomm platforms the PMIC RTC control and time registers are > > > read-only so that the RTC time can not be updated. Instead an offset > > > needs be stored in some machine-specific non-volatile memory, which a > > > driver can take into account. > > > > > > Add an 'offset' nvmem cell which can be used to store a 32-bit offset > > > from the Unix epoch so that the RTC time can be updated on such > > > platforms. > > > > > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml > > > index 21c8ea08ff0a..b95a69cc9ae0 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml > > > @@ -40,6 +40,16 @@ properties: > > > description: > > > Indicates that the setting of RTC time is allowed by the host CPU. > > > > > > + nvmem-cells: > > > + items: > > > + - description: > > > + four-byte nvmem cell holding a little-endian offset from the Unix > > > + epoch representing the time when the RTC timer was last reset > > > + > > > + nvmem-cell-names: > > > + items: > > > + - const: offset > > > + > > > wakeup-source: true > > > > The patch doesn't apply because this part of the context is not > > upstream. Can you rebase? > > Ah, sorry about that. That's because of commit 51b3802e7960 > ("dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: allow 'wakeup-source' property") which > is now in Linus's tree (and your rtc-fixes branch). > > Do you still want me to rebase or do you prefer to handle the conflict > some other way? Ah yes, my bad, I'll merge rtc-fixes in rtc-next before applying -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com