Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDA7C61DA4 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 18:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229649AbjBKSyL (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Feb 2023 13:54:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41620 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229488AbjBKSyJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Feb 2023 13:54:09 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E04193EE; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 10:54:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id cq19so5423448edb.5; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 10:54:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:cc:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qQilzVYvGI9FErjP5374cx23YQpTQrZLFOEiYvclZpg=; b=EW8Ig6xfjGwrXgjurd+dwrxjBE8obvY6P/pLIzwDJfCBhZCKEaHPHYdPl0g/Lrikl4 1XwdixE/Zjb7BHJp5tehvK6Tx2GiMjmHn5ltazzbVU3wfVOt2cgfh2tUzTYLknMwhZvz r23lUPe7HcY3CY8kZYUnEbUzlX50givr6h20zOiTLszJtUnabrFtOjC3k1CfIg0cen6Z h9MFrUHgtTYlmQktMZ88H5qfllHST9QzsYnL2g+ZGZN07TXDjYwI8gVoUZuH33gQQWi+ 7BFYwCvOAbaj83bYotI6EssvCUTb4V5CX3POLt0sZLIdQNgMUxeMRSieWLce40dwKxGB lDFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:cc:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qQilzVYvGI9FErjP5374cx23YQpTQrZLFOEiYvclZpg=; b=v6smk3hP9LvclqeMR41gzuT8j89XEMNH0pV+F8+Pjs4pmZjQ0bCUmOhl27MwXS2mIZ 3p0Bc2AcSjZxe97m8xvOq4IjawnjV+pQ3HGOL6225MFeCt14RQCcOmb1brBoBn5rst+u AbVsyXt1gv/xwFKOSMY4dGDiHYtMs3X603zoEtpMFsLOJ6gfDjWUUCtsGyeYvqtcCVjP ZxBxrT0/v0lygGyqXeWuYeBtK1EoSunNqGMf410kdWiS6vjrTRE5rY+5HDy6Z+3sMt/l F+mUn02h7OoCL/JN/M8WdOmQhspvTdJNTfi3oty2cC4adVOD9mP5oqfPlTcV13BT9ehU 0xIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWOuLf+wVbXxLQ+EsffUiixTdWek8k1Z4pG2brxp+bitV/leSnu VWG+e4H2Vwvz4ImDLbmDQqI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set94rpGvGlXmQuz0W6b4tXTpKCBBYMNLk5z2yIdqtfLeBWaBMud6rjJFCtzg2tAegUrAAlDSwA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:d756:0:b0:4ac:b7ba:3d58 with SMTP id i22-20020a50d756000000b004acb7ba3d58mr2401860edj.12.1676141647232; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 10:54:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.22] ([87.116.164.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o8-20020a50c908000000b004a2666397casm4006188edh.63.2023.02.11.10.54.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Feb 2023 10:54:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <00875064-0407-b114-56c9-87aecb0d3ee4@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 19:54:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Cc: savicaleksa83@gmail.com, Jack Doan , Jean Delvare , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] hwmon: (aquacomputer_d5next) Add temperature offset control for Aquaero To: Guenter Roeck , Leonard Anderweit , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org References: <20230211165923.17807-1-leonard.anderweit@gmail.com> <20230211165923.17807-4-leonard.anderweit@gmail.com> <0664b935-d201-419a-3f1d-3df4226a8db1@roeck-us.net> Content-Language: en-US From: Aleksa Savic In-Reply-To: <0664b935-d201-419a-3f1d-3df4226a8db1@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023-02-11 19:08:27 GMT+01:00, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > aquaero is already supported, and the checksum is so far generated > and sent. Is it ignored ? Also, is it guaranteed that _all_ aquero devices > don't need it ? Reading its sensors is currently supported, not writing to it (before these patches). The checksum is ignored and not needed for either aquaero 5 (which Leonard has) nor 6 (which I have). > > If it is not needed and ignored, does it really add value to selectively drop it ? I think we can indeed remove that check. Thanks, Aleksa > > Either case, this change is not mentioned in the commit log, and it > violates the "one logical change per patch" rule. Please split it into > a separate patch and explain why the change is needed. > > Another change to separate is the introduction of ctrl_report_id > and the secondary_ctrl_report variables, which is also done silently > and not explained. That should also be a separate patch to simplify > review. > > Thanks, > Guenter