Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758046AbXIEPk5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:40:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757437AbXIEPkc (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:40:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.opengridcomputing.com ([71.42.183.126]:55490 "EHLO smtp.opengridcomputing.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757150AbXIEPka (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:40:30 -0400 Message-ID: <46DECDED.90903@opengridcomputing.com> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:40:29 -0500 From: Steve Wise User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Dreier CC: general@lists.openfabrics.org, ewg@lists.openfabrics.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sean.hefty@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts with the host stack. References: <1187905185.5547.13.camel@stevo-desktop> <46DD762F.80904@opengridcomputing.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2037 Lines: 49 Roland Dreier wrote: > > > What's wrong with my suggestion of having the iwarp driver create an > > > "iwX" interface to go with the normal "ethX" interface? It seems > > > simpler to me, and there's a somewhat similar precedent with how > > > mac80211 devices create both wlan0 and wmaster0 interfaces. > > > - R. > > > > It seemed much more painful for me to implement. :-) > > > > I'll look into this, but I think for this to be done, the changes must > > be in the cxgb3 driver, not the rdma driver, because the guts of the > > netdev struct are all private to cxgb3. Remember that this interface > > needs to still do non TCP traffic (like ARP and UDP)... > > > > Maybe you have something in mind here that I'm not thinking about? > > No, I was just spouting off. > At least someone is looking at my patch. ;-) > But the whole "create a magic alias" seems kind of unfriendly to the > user. Maybe as you said, the cxgb3 net driver could create the alias > for the iw_cxgb3 driver? I agree that it is not very user friendly. My current patch just utilizes the IP address alias logic in the IP stack. So when you do 'ifconfig ethxx:blah ipaddr up' it creates a struct in_ifaddr which contains a ptr to the real struct net_device that services this alias. However, from what I can tell, I cannot just create one of these without binding an address. So the driver cannot create the alias interface until it knows the ipaddr/netmask/etc. IE: if you say 'ifconfig ethxx:blah up' it fails... You must supply an address to get one of these created. To have the cxgb3 driver create something like 'iw0', I think it would need to create a full net_device struct. This makes the change much more complex. But perhaps its the right thing to do... Steve. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/