Date:   Sun, 12 Feb 2023 17:15:58 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
To:     Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
cc:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@microsoft.com>,
        Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla1280: Replace arithmetic addition by bitwise
 OR
In-Reply-To: <Y+kE0oWExkE6sLnH@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2302121715090.9268@hadrien>
References: <Y+I7/QpQYjBXutLf@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org> <aed35866-507c-870c-7e8a-c1868bcaa084@acm.org> <Y+kA1j10JCsLG9mN@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org> <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2302121611010.9268@hadrien>
 <Y+kE0oWExkE6sLnH@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 12 Feb 2023, Deepak R Varma wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 04:11:58PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 12 Feb 2023, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 03:25:03PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > > On 2/7/23 03:54, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > > > When adding two bit-field mask values, an OR operation offers higher
> > > > > performance over an arithmetic operation. So, convert such addition to
> > > > > an OR based expression.
> > > >
> > > > Where is the evidence that supports this claim? On the following page I read
> > > > that there is no performance difference when using a modern CPU: https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/75811/why-is-addition-as-fast-as-bit-wise-operations-in-modern-processors
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hello Bart,
> > > You are correct. Modern CPU designs have improved addition and the performance
> > > is at par with the bitwise operation. The document I had read earlier mentioned
> > > a performance improvement for old CPUs and microprocessors, which today is not
> > > the case. Thank you for sharing the link.
> > >
> > > > > Issue identified using orplus.cocci semantic patch script.
> > > >
> > > > Where is that script located? Can it be deleted such that submission of
> > > > patches similar to this patch stops?
> > >
> > > I have added Julia to this email to understand how to best use this semantic
> > > patch. I already discussed with her on improving the Semantic patch such that it
> > > doesn't suggest making change when constants are involved.
> >
> > FWIW, the semantic patch was never motivated by efficiency, but rather
> > with the goal of making the code more understandable.
>
> I think my interpretation of the patch log for [1] was not accurate. The line
> "Running time is divided by 3 ..." made me believe OR'ing would replace "F+A+R"
> instructions by a single operation. My bad.

Ah, interesting.  I have no idea any more the running time of what.

julia


>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/alpine.DEB.2.20.1711130649370.2483@hadrien/
>
> >
> > julia
>
>
>