Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932555AbXIEQ2X (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:28:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756905AbXIEQ2P (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:28:15 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.15]:50466 "EHLO pat.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756795AbXIEQ2O (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:28:14 -0400 Subject: Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression From: Trond Myklebust To: Ian Kent Cc: David Howells , Bill Davidsen , Linus Torvalds , Frank van Maarseveen , Hua Zhong , "'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" , akpm@linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <1188996257.3119.7.camel@raven.themaw.net> References: <46DA0AB1.8050504@tmr.com> <000701c7eb49$cff701c0$6fe50540$@com> <1188513433.6626.24.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1188577275.6649.133.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <5813.1188892468@redhat.com> <1188996257.3119.7.camel@raven.themaw.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:26:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1189009592.13235.37.camel@gaula.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Resend: resent X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.0, required=12.0, autolearn=disabled, none) X-UiO-Scanned: AED06AA464E6DDB9E8B572D5F7DE7BC305878325 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.10.9 spam_score: 0 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 435 total 3690025 max/h 8345 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 950 Lines: 25 On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 20:44 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 08:54 +0100, David Howells wrote: > > Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > > > mount /base on point1 - rw [ hopefully really r/w ] > > > mount /base on point2 - ro [ hopefully r/o ] > > > > I think Al Viro probably has the right idea as to how to fix this: Move the > > R/O R/W flag into vfsmount and count the number of R/W vfsmounts in the > > superblock. I never quite finished implementing the patch to do this, but I > > can go back and revisit it. > > But what about mounting with different protocol, tcp vs udp for example. > > Ian With the patch that Linus merged, we will fork off a new superblock. Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/