Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757699AbXIERXc (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:23:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755298AbXIERXL (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:23:11 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]:59697 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754133AbXIERXI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:23:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=fuT/9XLIecsOgtGK2D6hjg5LBdOJk9tykmgl9qAnUYpGsg7svVSlqY4H8tyN+Lu9G+OL+IQfXecBjvV1Sl2RICe+AkQfxqQ2C+xxnWnZgZVxy2E5cQEMfuThdPomjmyF7/yLMrbPuHUPJZrDzXs+JwToI9Jt3u2AF19DzQ1WS2M= Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:22:52 +0400 To: James Pearson Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Anton Arapov , Guy Streeter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ? Message-ID: <20070905172252.GA2104@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> References: <4474B7DB.8000304@moving-picture.com> <200605242029.k4OKTn9C031700@terminus.zytor.com> <447EF58C.6000605@moving-picture.com> <52dd17640708150954q798d137cn1b07739785917c5b@mail.gmail.com> <46C33700.1060605@zytor.com> <46D6CBED.4040301@moving-picture.com> <46DE6196.3050605@zytor.com> <46DEE0C9.1000402@moving-picture.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46DEE0C9.1000402@moving-picture.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Alexey Dobriyan Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1215 Lines: 33 On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 06:00:57PM +0100, James Pearson wrote: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >Anton Arapov wrote: > > > >> Hey guys, the future of this patch is important for me. What do you > >>think, has this patch any chances to be committed to upstream? > >> > >>James Pearson writes: > >> > >>>H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>>There isn't that much that is duplicated - and there are also bits of > >>>the /proc/PID/mem code that are not needed in this case, so I'm not > >>>really sure if it is worth doing. > >>> > >>>I did submit a patch a few months ago - see: > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >Looks reasonable to me, except for the one overlong line. > > > > OK, here is the patch (without the long line) against 2.6.23-rc5 - what > else needs to be done to get it committed? Remove duplicate ptrace_may_attach() checks, unecessary (), {} and spaces before pointer names -- char *buf. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/