Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932374AbXIETgz (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 15:36:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932114AbXIETgr (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 15:36:47 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:44253 "EHLO gateway-1237.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932096AbXIETgq (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 15:36:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] build system: section garbage collection for vmlinux From: Daniel Walker To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Denys Vlasenko , sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070905193150.GI16016@stusta.de> References: <200709051443.21522.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <200709051937.04014.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <1189017519.4442.24.camel@imap.mvista.com> <200709052014.12653.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20070905193150.GI16016@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:24:04 -0700 Message-Id: <1189020244.4442.32.camel@imap.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1670 Lines: 40 On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 21:31 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 08:14:12PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 September 2007 19:38, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > You version doesn't work with CONFIG_MODULES right? > > > > > > > > It works with CONFIG_MODULES. > > > > > > Really? Take a look at this version, > > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/4/169 > > > > > > Marcello had to implement a two pass build to add back symbol used in > > > modules which got removed from the main kernel.. You don't appear to do > > > that. Marcelo also claims better size reduction than you. > > > > This will discard EXPORT_SYMBOLs potentially used by > > out-of-tree modules. > > > > I also saw ~10% size reductions, but then at run-time test modules > > failed to load, they didn't find needed symbols. > > > > OTOH if I know that I am not going to be using such modules, > > then this can be done. Will require another CONFIG_xxx, though. > > One point to keep in mind is that the space penalty of CONFIG_MODULES=y > is so big that CONFIG_MODULES=n is actually the most interesting case > for small systems that really need small kernels. Marcelo's version actual deals with the CONFIG_MODULES=y penalty , which is interesting to me .. It removes symbols added for CONFIG_MODULES which actually aren't used .. So CONFIG_MODULES=y is just as interesting as without (to me at least..). Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/