Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix (improve) deadlock condition on module removal
	netfilter socket option removal
From: Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
       adam@yggdrasil.com, jcm@jonmasters.org,
       netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20070905192744.GB25050@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
References: <20070904202433.GA19083@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
	 <46DEC9BF.9010807@trash.net>
	 <1189008806.10802.150.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20070905170831.GA25050@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
	 <1189014097.10802.174.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20070905192744.GB25050@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: World Organi[sz]ation Of Broken Dreams
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:17:21 -0400
Message-Id: <1189023441.12261.142.camel@jcmlaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 958
Lines: 22

On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 15:27 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:

> Now, I suppose its possible that I've not been looking at the right source tree
> when doing my work.  I've based my modprobe patch on this git tree:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/module-init-tools.git;a=summary
> If theres a newer one, if you could please point it out to me, I'd appreciate
> it.  If the functional equivalent of my second patch is already in there, then
> we just need my first patch to be good to go.

Ah, you want http://www.kerneltools.org/ - there's info on current trees
and versions there. I am in the process of moving to kernel.org.

I will check the patch situation right now anyway, leave it with me.

Jon.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/