Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88768C6379F for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:48:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231389AbjBMTs1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:48:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50754 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231374AbjBMTs0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:48:26 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11AF44C1A; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:48:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 31DINf3C021619; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:48:12 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=d1tFLPXrbNvvWu9cPufctBsOFiSwOguAEb7uyG/PgBA=; b=apXchMhpK16CAiNOeGsz5ClGhuzNhuRhosf6LOzzwYyR20IqLOCTqhpV5W0OmTmHKtLC M+c5NXMD2Wk7us59U1n5virOzbO7UGoxFHdAU3/+iP4MW8H3gtPBwIk0er/Y4xaw9S5m CeSIFXgKM7eB/oQSX7SYGNDIgEt78RDeg0rFpywrjc+fVvlb3A8Oe1Ayqa/McAsZtyZn b5VcTYgVhOYVShDI+pDwG9oeYTSlwAuZBh6Yw2nH30vClWk6e6d2vjjicaO7/1gasM8g DgdCcdBLk2JV82ZojuC8W11iQBkXgvu5gJ1vNmpgmFIyy2v0aSEJljqr7BH27dawg74w 4A== Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nqtethth0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:48:12 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 31DJhMOV028289; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:48:10 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3np2n6a9gk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:48:10 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.102]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 31DJm8qF49545542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:48:08 GMT Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9B220043; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:48:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43A320040; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:48:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.20.198]) by smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:48:06 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:18:03 +0530 From: Ojaswin Mujoo To: Kemeng Shi Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] ext4: Remove unnecessary release when memory allocation failed in ext4_mb_init_cache Message-ID: References: <20230209194825.511043-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> <20230209194825.511043-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230209194825.511043-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: BsWrfuTIEM6w21C60u2ukSaXUgAYWXzX X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: BsWrfuTIEM6w21C60u2ukSaXUgAYWXzX X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-02-13_12,2023-02-13_01,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2302130171 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 03:48:14AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote: > If we alloc array of buffer_head failed, there is no resource need to be > freed and we can simpily return error. > > Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi > --- > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > index ad9e3b7d3198..15fc7105becc 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > @@ -1168,10 +1168,8 @@ static int ext4_mb_init_cache(struct page *page, char *incore, gfp_t gfp) > if (groups_per_page > 1) { > i = sizeof(struct buffer_head *) * groups_per_page; > bh = kzalloc(i, gfp); > - if (bh == NULL) { > - err = -ENOMEM; > - goto out; > - } > + if (bh == NULL) > + return -ENOMEM; > } else > bh = &bhs; > > -- > 2.30.0 > Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo