Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757505AbXIFFYF (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2007 01:24:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751647AbXIFFXz (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2007 01:23:55 -0400 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:56584 "EHLO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751639AbXIFFXy (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2007 01:23:54 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 7uxIcupw/FT+mymrllQL6q1YbON0l10YcED13uaKfDOI 1189056230 Subject: Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression From: Ian Kent To: Trond Myklebust Cc: David Howells , Bill Davidsen , Linus Torvalds , Frank van Maarseveen , Hua Zhong , "'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" , akpm@linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <1189007414.13235.20.camel@gaula.trondhjem.org> References: <1188996257.3119.7.camel@raven.themaw.net> <46DA0AB1.8050504@tmr.com> <000701c7eb49$cff701c0$6fe50540$@com> <1188513433.6626.24.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1188577275.6649.133.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <5813.1188892468@redhat.com> <3558.1189006671@redhat.com> <1189007414.13235.20.camel@gaula.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:23:43 +0800 Message-Id: <1189056223.3102.99.camel@raven.themaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1079 Lines: 28 On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:50 +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:37 +0100, David Howells wrote: > > Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > But what about mounting with different protocol, tcp vs udp for example. > > > > I was referring specifically to the R/O / R/W variants of the same mount. Any > > flag variation that varies the way the NFS client talks to the NFS server must > > either result in a new superblock or be ignored. > > > > David > > We currently ignore remount requests that attempt to change the NFS > mount parameters. This is not new behaviour, BTW: it has always been the > case, and nobody has ever requested it. Yes, I only mentioned it because I'm aware it. I've not payed much attention to it because there haven't been any complaints so far and it's been a long time. Ian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/