Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 18:09:33 +0100
From:   Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To:     Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
Cc:     jchapman@katalix.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
        kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] l2tp: Avoid possible recursive deadlock in
 l2tp_tunnel_register()
Message-ID: <Y+vATfTKLogXw+Ki@debian>
References: <20230212162623.2301597-1-syoshida@redhat.com>
 <Y+pPXOqfrYkXPg1K@debian>
 <Y+u7hGIAxhvyDG/2@kernel-devel>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y+u7hGIAxhvyDG/2@kernel-devel>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:49:08AM +0900, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> Just one more thing.  I created this patch based on the mainline linux
> tree, but networking subsystem has own tree, net.  Is it preferable to
> create a patch based on net tree for networking patches?

Yes. Networking fixes should be based on the "net" tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git

For more details about posting patches to netdev, you can check
Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst

Or the online version:
https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

> Thanks,
> Shigeru
> 
> > 
>