Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB05C05027 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 18:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231635AbjBNSKL (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:10:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41754 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233309AbjBNSKH (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:10:07 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x230.google.com (mail-oi1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::230]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F01B4; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:09:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x230.google.com with SMTP id bh15so13673311oib.4; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:09:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6Y717KJbIRjmj+t9kJAIvgBCc3UIFcYLwVTbZ9RsBPk=; b=XwcIdw9ldMHQ4ayiqMbANGBH3Ycpl/ADyKalw8WJRsox/7OgE4QrKcKc8mlpGGmZoA dbwJnZEDuVUxTw07bumv6cXJks3KX3Aa6f3EaPhlrMTN1rhyS1Q9QKYqP86Qt/gmE/Z4 RTODsASPYD51aEVqcsdFl3hs9g5fNjKrWpFzZsPxLpN0sqq7sy+LzKWDsUzY24pxrIEO R69UNBna63ls2/KXD7bTM9zNdQKqMAvfxfrcPGTxeVwyHX11VVLpR/enCawt/Dogh2Nl l8/5PkHxPdQRRPsfeb0zAa1VOXn7j7ZtLosQabO/vHs6T2+eGD9GCF1Z/KvjSiWTJN5l EMNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6Y717KJbIRjmj+t9kJAIvgBCc3UIFcYLwVTbZ9RsBPk=; b=ywrVTq+Og8Cuwz/nVnA4TqTdSmVMWuBPEHBxVHwMBO0aHcNHPCKyU89LmnqYXcG2TB +02Wq7WXTt+YeXkxiyS2ylAWKvGJz7RPK+s9Kdg8UfV2IxTVQYqZVcHo8X8aOKA8Z+Qv PE1ctX/pPoJfwBUcqXfi4nlz1/14BR0rCsltbTM9ORlM7QpvJPCAtpXF6JK/9lmik2MF jNCpnCzifAa6jHVWkDxWYmyWwbBOYUeYBO86Ex80stW7k2GVYbglUm+KeD5Bj+YRqQim eXamxee/7OojrhwZfwQVm4b5mT493tzRGSqLKrKOOzCSZbMP2nlQpDFNkmmYsjXQqpHb QTwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW/B5eVGa/wAthT7thBhA2bgt4W6wNnv8D83RBMtlPTbw1xVc4q 1biCkyZB0f65hqWl4wQB65o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/Ipu5a6wQXpVlF4OsXb8/OusLhF5tQD1rtSUbjH7bFzZF2ZxmmKiZVGnoNT26vDqW2b3u40w== X-Received: by 2002:aca:2b09:0:b0:378:3c87:5092 with SMTP id i9-20020aca2b09000000b003783c875092mr1501490oik.5.1676398198584; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:09:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c? ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p125-20020acad883000000b003436fa2c23bsm6463808oig.7.2023.02.14.10.09.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:09:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:09:55 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/139] 5.10.168-rc1 review Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de References: <20230213144745.696901179@linuxfoundation.org> <05984672-d897-6050-3e8b-3e7984c81bd9@roeck-us.net> <1cd10087-87fe-048e-c9ed-0a5d32c50764@roeck-us.net> From: Guenter Roeck In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/14/23 09:54, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:51 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> Reverting the nvmem patches fixed this problem. > > But upstream is fine? > Yes, this was a bad backport. One of the nvmem patches was missing from the backport. However, a fix for that missing patch was backported, causing a double device registration and all kinds of interesting problems. Guenter