Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AE2C61DA4 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232910AbjBOBHk (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:07:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51842 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232691AbjBOBH1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:07:27 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x34a.google.com (mail-ot1-x34a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::34a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01DE42DE5B for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 17:07:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x34a.google.com with SMTP id r6-20020a056830448600b0068d5c6e86easo8614687otv.10 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 17:07:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=alb97r+DX7PehFMTgq6B9eu/Os3M9Qni8gUbhL07Tdg=; b=NOY/beDDKj+whtpYM1ucXY2f8kUIHHuIOuB8Nk/ClACledvRSZhMh0yGz24FaryGCd EZv32D2l9Aw4vfU5CDrNQFq1sa1kTde7CPA8J0vSENKqoqmVLy9gBSgew68kiYGLQrSE nba1ln785wnxO941T+uX+ad4ET77HjH8vFG97kPPjkK6Hk9nTDoc8wDyn9FzE7zO1zDx FJ7cjhwIK79+w166tlSkUeMREr+dWBrilMCxnECJ8G2YgB208lgBNf+DMu9YQ198m3ON +JqBcyAq3jlSwFrqi6uEntnbnHCNKGojI5xLRVSiqvMcq2k6r8mI6vL32LdACDudupfs Sr+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=alb97r+DX7PehFMTgq6B9eu/Os3M9Qni8gUbhL07Tdg=; b=CCVUk9Z1uEZQC4ATHa69gQrPKv0YOomnOr8kX1JTads6gtEqWRt6DJVFWKNwu6dMme TG5mTiVGpgysu0aded2uSl3aG+J8bUZ8uyMZFpDlgNQMRkcu+vjiBgWSU7tbnmOEuKUq iSXPMU9kcbzFgIPsd4I0GajXgHmYmvDfFM/07gX/J5fyQPODRoI8Wnwveh2R91djMWyT rRASn+gZmS6wNSoqJNl0geuglolU+lpyS1T3QJNCr65688io80WtfoUVa4utCE1aNAmo /pTV03H58xUQ2HFqlT7zaLjC2lCs/+Buprf8tYjub47kY1SHuB1nAQHCFaHu1YGL/rS5 jsAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWo8/Ldvg0Dsnfz8oudWOW+uY/FhwwbBZtBhg7i2DvyQZB7+pWL QWDjCMlvn2acMYMAJt0Nrkcrbc28G7sb X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8RZc77yKwZerPzE3jU+p0xxGmxroJ9jnv79/W64YPupa5Fkq7lp7PUJft1eWG9zZ3UTyn9WZZy3lKa X-Received: from rananta-linux.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:2b:ff92:c0a8:22b5]) (user=rananta job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6830:12d0:b0:68b:e15b:6df4 with SMTP id a16-20020a05683012d000b0068be15b6df4mr13119otq.63.1676423244260; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 17:07:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:07:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20230215010717.3612794-1-rananta@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230215010717.3612794-1-rananta@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog Message-ID: <20230215010717.3612794-4-rananta@google.com> Subject: [REPOST PATCH 03/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for implemented counters From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta To: Oliver Upton , Reiji Watanabe , Marc Zyngier , Ricardo Koller , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Jing Zhang , Colton Lewis , Raghavendra Rao Anata , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Reiji Watanabe Add a new test case to the vpmu_counter_access test to check if PMU registers or their bits for implemented counters on the vCPU are readable/writable as expected, and can be programmed to count events. Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta --- .../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 347 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c index 7a4333f64daef..b6593eee2be3d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ * Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC. * * This test checks if the guest can see the same number of the PMU event - * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets. + * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets, and if the guest can access + * those counters. * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 is supported on the host. */ #include @@ -18,14 +19,348 @@ /* The max number of the PMU event counters (excluding the cycle counter) */ #define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS (ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1) +/* + * The macros and functions below for reading/writing PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}_EL0 + * were basically copied from arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c. + */ +#define PMEVN_CASE(n, case_macro) \ + case n: case_macro(n); break + +#define PMEVN_SWITCH(x, case_macro) \ + do { \ + switch (x) { \ + PMEVN_CASE(0, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(1, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(2, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(3, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(4, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(5, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(6, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(7, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(8, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(9, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(10, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(11, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(12, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(13, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(14, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(15, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(16, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(17, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(18, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(19, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(20, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(21, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(22, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(23, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(24, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(25, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(26, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(27, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(28, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(29, case_macro); \ + PMEVN_CASE(30, case_macro); \ + default: \ + GUEST_ASSERT_1(0, x); \ + } \ + } while (0) + +#define RETURN_READ_PMEVCNTRN(n) \ + return read_sysreg(pmevcntr##n##_el0) +static unsigned long read_pmevcntrn(int n) +{ + PMEVN_SWITCH(n, RETURN_READ_PMEVCNTRN); + return 0; +} + +#define WRITE_PMEVCNTRN(n) \ + write_sysreg(val, pmevcntr##n##_el0) +static void write_pmevcntrn(int n, unsigned long val) +{ + PMEVN_SWITCH(n, WRITE_PMEVCNTRN); + isb(); +} + +#define READ_PMEVTYPERN(n) \ + return read_sysreg(pmevtyper##n##_el0) +static unsigned long read_pmevtypern(int n) +{ + PMEVN_SWITCH(n, READ_PMEVTYPERN); + return 0; +} + +#define WRITE_PMEVTYPERN(n) \ + write_sysreg(val, pmevtyper##n##_el0) +static void write_pmevtypern(int n, unsigned long val) +{ + PMEVN_SWITCH(n, WRITE_PMEVTYPERN); + isb(); +} + +/* Read PMEVTCNTR_EL0 through PMXEVCNTR_EL0 */ +static inline unsigned long read_sel_evcntr(int sel) +{ + write_sysreg(sel, pmselr_el0); + isb(); + return read_sysreg(pmxevcntr_el0); +} + +/* Write PMEVTCNTR_EL0 through PMXEVCNTR_EL0 */ +static inline void write_sel_evcntr(int sel, unsigned long val) +{ + write_sysreg(sel, pmselr_el0); + isb(); + write_sysreg(val, pmxevcntr_el0); + isb(); +} + +/* Read PMEVTYPER_EL0 through PMXEVTYPER_EL0 */ +static inline unsigned long read_sel_evtyper(int sel) +{ + write_sysreg(sel, pmselr_el0); + isb(); + return read_sysreg(pmxevtyper_el0); +} + +/* Write PMEVTYPER_EL0 through PMXEVTYPER_EL0 */ +static inline void write_sel_evtyper(int sel, unsigned long val) +{ + write_sysreg(sel, pmselr_el0); + isb(); + write_sysreg(val, pmxevtyper_el0); + isb(); +} + +static inline void enable_counter(int idx) +{ + uint64_t v = read_sysreg(pmcntenset_el0); + + write_sysreg(BIT(idx) | v, pmcntenset_el0); + isb(); +} + +static inline void disable_counter(int idx) +{ + uint64_t v = read_sysreg(pmcntenset_el0); + + write_sysreg(BIT(idx) | v, pmcntenclr_el0); + isb(); +} + +/* + * The pmc_accessor structure has pointers to PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}_EL0 + * accessors that test cases will use. Each of the accessors will + * either directly reads/writes PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}_EL0 + * (i.e. {read,write}_pmev{cnt,type}rn()), or reads/writes them through + * PMXEV{CNTR,TYPER}_EL0 (i.e. {read,write}_sel_ev{cnt,type}r()). + * + * This is used to test that combinations of those accessors provide + * the consistent behavior. + */ +struct pmc_accessor { + /* A function to be used to read PMEVTCNTR_EL0 */ + unsigned long (*read_cntr)(int idx); + /* A function to be used to write PMEVTCNTR_EL0 */ + void (*write_cntr)(int idx, unsigned long val); + /* A function to be used to read PMEVTYPER_EL0 */ + unsigned long (*read_typer)(int idx); + /* A function to be used to write PMEVTYPER_EL0 */ + void (*write_typer)(int idx, unsigned long val); +}; + +struct pmc_accessor pmc_accessors[] = { + /* test with all direct accesses */ + { read_pmevcntrn, write_pmevcntrn, read_pmevtypern, write_pmevtypern }, + /* test with all indirect accesses */ + { read_sel_evcntr, write_sel_evcntr, read_sel_evtyper, write_sel_evtyper }, + /* read with direct accesses, and write with indirect accesses */ + { read_pmevcntrn, write_sel_evcntr, read_pmevtypern, write_sel_evtyper }, + /* read with indirect accesses, and write with direct accesses */ + { read_sel_evcntr, write_pmevcntrn, read_sel_evtyper, write_pmevtypern }, +}; + +static void pmu_disable_reset(void) +{ + uint64_t pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0); + + /* Reset all counters, disabling them */ + pmcr &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E; + write_sysreg(pmcr | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P, pmcr_el0); + isb(); +} + +static void pmu_enable(void) +{ + uint64_t pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0); + + /* Reset all counters, disabling them */ + pmcr |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E; + write_sysreg(pmcr | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P, pmcr_el0); + isb(); +} + +static bool pmu_event_is_supported(uint64_t event) +{ + GUEST_ASSERT_1(event < 64, event); + return (read_sysreg(pmceid0_el0) & BIT(event)); +} + +#define GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(regname, mask, set_expected) \ +{ \ + uint64_t _tval = read_sysreg(regname); \ + \ + if (set_expected) \ + GUEST_ASSERT_3((_tval & mask), _tval, mask, set_expected); \ + else \ + GUEST_ASSERT_3(!(_tval & mask), _tval, mask, set_expected);\ +} + +/* + * Check if @mask bits in {PMCNTEN,PMINTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR} registers + * are set or cleared as specified in @set_expected. + */ +static void check_bitmap_pmu_regs(uint64_t mask, bool set_expected) +{ + GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(pmcntenset_el0, mask, set_expected); + GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(pmcntenclr_el0, mask, set_expected); + GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(pmintenset_el1, mask, set_expected); + GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(pmintenclr_el1, mask, set_expected); + GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(pmovsset_el0, mask, set_expected); + GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(pmovsclr_el0, mask, set_expected); +} + +/* + * Check if the bit in {PMCNTEN,PMINTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR} registers corresponding + * to the specified counter (@pmc_idx) can be read/written as expected. + * When @set_op is true, it tries to set the bit for the counter in + * those registers by writing the SET registers (the bit won't be set + * if the counter is not implemented though). + * Otherwise, it tries to clear the bits in the registers by writing + * the CLR registers. + * Then, it checks if the values indicated in the registers are as expected. + */ +static void test_bitmap_pmu_regs(int pmc_idx, bool set_op) +{ + uint64_t pmcr_n, test_bit = BIT(pmc_idx); + bool set_expected = false; + + if (set_op) { + write_sysreg(test_bit, pmcntenset_el0); + write_sysreg(test_bit, pmintenset_el1); + write_sysreg(test_bit, pmovsset_el0); + + /* The bit will be set only if the counter is implemented */ + pmcr_n = FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N, read_sysreg(pmcr_el0)); + set_expected = (pmc_idx < pmcr_n) ? true : false; + } else { + write_sysreg(test_bit, pmcntenclr_el0); + write_sysreg(test_bit, pmintenclr_el1); + write_sysreg(test_bit, pmovsclr_el0); + } + check_bitmap_pmu_regs(test_bit, set_expected); +} + +/* + * Tests for reading/writing registers for the (implemented) event counter + * specified by @pmc_idx. + */ +static void test_access_pmc_regs(struct pmc_accessor *acc, int pmc_idx) +{ + uint64_t write_data, read_data, read_data_prev; + + /* Disable all PMCs and reset all PMCs to zero. */ + pmu_disable_reset(); + + + /* + * Tests for reading/writing {PMCNTEN,PMINTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR}_EL1. + */ + + /* Make sure that the bit in those registers are set to 0 */ + test_bitmap_pmu_regs(pmc_idx, false); + /* Test if setting the bit in those registers works */ + test_bitmap_pmu_regs(pmc_idx, true); + /* Test if clearing the bit in those registers works */ + test_bitmap_pmu_regs(pmc_idx, false); + + + /* + * Tests for reading/writing the event type register. + */ + + read_data = acc->read_typer(pmc_idx); + /* + * Set the event type register to an arbitrary value just for testing + * of reading/writing the register. + * ArmARM says that for the event from 0x0000 to 0x003F, + * the value indicated in the PMEVTYPER_EL0.evtCount field is + * the value written to the field even when the specified event + * is not supported. + */ + write_data = (ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL1 | ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_INST_RETIRED); + acc->write_typer(pmc_idx, write_data); + read_data = acc->read_typer(pmc_idx); + GUEST_ASSERT_4(read_data == write_data, + pmc_idx, acc, read_data, write_data); + + + /* + * Tests for reading/writing the event count register. + */ + + read_data = acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx); + + /* The count value must be 0, as it is not used after the reset */ + GUEST_ASSERT_3(read_data == 0, pmc_idx, acc, read_data); + + write_data = read_data + pmc_idx + 0x12345; + acc->write_cntr(pmc_idx, write_data); + read_data = acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx); + GUEST_ASSERT_4(read_data == write_data, + pmc_idx, acc, read_data, write_data); + + + /* The following test requires the INST_RETIRED event support. */ + if (!pmu_event_is_supported(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_INST_RETIRED)) + return; + + pmu_enable(); + acc->write_typer(pmc_idx, ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_INST_RETIRED); + + /* + * Make sure that the counter doesn't count the INST_RETIRED + * event when disabled, and the counter counts the event when enabled. + */ + disable_counter(pmc_idx); + read_data_prev = acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx); + read_data = acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx); + GUEST_ASSERT_4(read_data == read_data_prev, + pmc_idx, acc, read_data, read_data_prev); + + enable_counter(pmc_idx); + read_data = acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx); + + /* + * The counter should be increased by at least 1, as there is at + * least one instruction between enabling the counter and reading + * the counter (the test assumes that all event counters are not + * being used by the host's higher priority events). + */ + GUEST_ASSERT_4(read_data > read_data_prev, + pmc_idx, acc, read_data, read_data_prev); +} + /* * The guest is configured with PMUv3 with @expected_pmcr_n number of * event counters. - * Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N. + * Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N, and + * if reading/writing PMU registers for implemented counters can work + * as expected. */ static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n) { uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n; + int i, pmc; GUEST_ASSERT(expected_pmcr_n <= ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS); @@ -35,6 +370,15 @@ static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n) /* Make sure that PMCR_EL0.N indicates the value userspace set */ GUEST_ASSERT_2(pmcr_n == expected_pmcr_n, pmcr_n, expected_pmcr_n); + /* + * Tests for reading/writing PMU registers for implemented counters. + * Use each combination of PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}_EL0 accessor functions. + */ + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors); i++) { + for (pmc = 0; pmc < pmcr_n; pmc++) + test_access_pmc_regs(&pmc_accessors[i], pmc); + } + GUEST_DONE(); } @@ -91,7 +435,7 @@ static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n) vcpu_run(vcpu); switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) { case UCALL_ABORT: - REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT_2(uc, "values:%#lx %#lx"); + REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT_4(uc, "values:%#lx %#lx %#lx %#lx"); break; case UCALL_DONE: break; -- 2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog