Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D1DC6379F for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233216AbjBOHZg (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 02:25:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52542 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233210AbjBOHZe (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 02:25:34 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF03128D1A; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 23:25:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1676445933; x=1707981933; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=LjjaY0wanbjM2Voc9Vtc9KSHmGP3+aYOAzgwBVYIhMI=; b=KZ2L4ug0m4hsMczolIRkP2SOTRZ8RNLC9poZntUGHueDsEkqWmM/AdtB 3FgGcZ0TlKLMpVJQzYpKW8IMkt07zDoOTTHofOJFlRoFfoMB7yeUfEWNS DVpXs58WFfaJrPY3nb7pbr7luxpof0rjA6IwBPqbblGhtCIzhNhWXZ4XT qH2MVgC99XPhbu0R53LpL1zy2vAKnS6JgkuKPzhe4DGjmuKIeB6jGpkY9 9SGpnE3sWJOuV3EJpUxfcWsdkEsdRhbXzmCqtYifwHwnp8/vrXoa48H8l hNmretR+BMU73xfyCV7Gd34pQQiqKNLcLwrwVzfrX8dV1t6sKRNVGFbp4 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10621"; a="358785066" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,299,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="358785066" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2023 23:25:33 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10621"; a="699858490" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,299,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="699858490" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2023 23:25:30 -0800 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A1EF61C5; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:26:10 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:26:10 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Mario Limonciello Cc: Andreas Noever , Michael Jamet , Yehezkel Bernat , Sanju.Mehta@amd.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] thunderbolt: Read DROM directly from NVM before trying bit banging Message-ID: References: <20230214154647.874-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com> <20230214154647.874-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com> <8f099a80-7fd1-c98a-4990-4a936a5a610a@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 08:24:39AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > I guess something else that might be less detrimental the loss of UUID > > by reading DROM this way would be to only read DROM this way if any CRC > > failed. > > Actually we do read UUID for TBT3 devices from link controller registers > (see tb_lc_read_uuid()) instead so I think perhaps we can limit the > bitbanging just for older TBT devices with no LC or something like that? Just make sure UUID stays the same so that users don't need to re-authorize their devices.