Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848A6C636D4 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231160AbjBOKD2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:03:28 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34184 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234163AbjBOKCq (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:02:46 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE56936FFA; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 02:01:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id r2so18466830wrv.7; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 02:01:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0O5OE1pYPf4Bdxg8Thv2IJmSFslR0r4iXq6hhQFPsQo=; b=KzdJLQ9yPDlXF96+31EwfJ15d7GWeppPU2bcWbiye8OU1ANGa/s5JxHn+oYTd3j/Yd 9gmPURkg0vkYa83IjBoBKQBZnPWguVscDRUj1vOpqktIzY78UPqTTi+pZnPCR85uxjoK Bh9rlMg/lzyMCy41s/85kS3a37kFDH6eaE5xvOCwMH+CO0gA/fy0ZptoeUi7LyjIaldZ fMERgJYu/7xMUCVwQo0cwDD6qK9atVSdWvruNj7rlW2w99oPt8KGZjbyng5Hpkq2fkpO BX3Ldx71gk1axXGm36btQcFoDQGuWhcx6yu0OA7xNUZbJ9XzS7y8ysZSAWgXAaD0P2zg 94lQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=0O5OE1pYPf4Bdxg8Thv2IJmSFslR0r4iXq6hhQFPsQo=; b=TEx56V6P2eBs3tYHzvUSEYOFBVRgehplZdKhGu/vBRLOw/pDoushXSzfezxh08RolY Ji8l183U3BkJRF0vStX/kQY9bJlTCVwYtCiLIt6RJzP1gPUGts0z3ct6Rz4XCG7LG++O RvEJkrEGXaXKpNdyW0VeElSd1bTcPg3mo4QZ4mP3goeMWSCBro9u9O8vc/sO0xb/nUnh Ja4287d4eyLvNBVn+IuOlT1yV+b3mXz7bppccNx+oNFtVzLGbe8aN6OfB9AMpufnC13p +HhvYEWIHJntRLToCWistx75DaQ/RWAdT+LiwugOWEHOoR4GxD6VZK2m7ArfY9BupFfZ eRjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVjnA9yhTfhU2VtCcW5LHVKjxYQ36LNILvBD0Yux2kEIiUa878H s2f1KVH8mhybFvseGCjuR2x5b6rJsCs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/syKP1KgtfZs0bsclPc0Y/kqWZICD77fWgN6l+GOibI6M9i43aofOjR0wF6puzx4glJuFFUw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fc10:0:b0:2c5:465d:c1ab with SMTP id i16-20020adffc10000000b002c5465dc1abmr971373wrr.51.1676455292352; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 02:01:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h12-20020adff4cc000000b002be505ab59asm15344981wrp.97.2023.02.15.02.01.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 02:01:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:01:30 +0000 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/134] 5.10.168-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20230214172549.450713187@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230214172549.450713187@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 06:41:06PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.168 release. > There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:25:19 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. My builds have tested f90240a238a9 v5.10.168-rc3 but I am not seeing any mail for that, bit confused now. The result is for v5.10.168-rc3. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230210): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2868 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2869 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip