Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:17:32 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
Cc:     Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mailbox: Allow direct registration to a channel
Message-ID: <20230215101732.pbpom3ub3yh75n4w@bogus>
References: <20230213232537.2040976-1-quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230213232537.2040976-1-quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:25:34PM -0800, Elliot Berman wrote:
> Two mailbox controllers have channel/client binding mechanisms that are
> controller-specific and not using the devicetree binding mechanisms. Mailbox
> channel/client is conceptually done in two steps: selecting the channel
> and binding the selected to channel to a client. Channel selection is sometimes
> controller specific (pcc and omap are examples). The channel/client binding
> code is all the same.
> 
> This small series de-duplicates and refactors the channel/client binding
> into a common framework function: "mbox_bind_client" which all of the
> channel selection mechanisms can use.
> 
> I found this duplicate code while working on the support for Gunyah hypervisor
> message queues [1]. I've only been able to compile-test omap-maiblox and pcc,
> however it is a straightforward conversion here.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230120224627.4053418-9-quic_eberman@quicinc.com/
> 
> Elliot Berman (3):
>   mailbox: Allow direct registration to a channel

I am unable to find the above patch either in my inbox or in lore[1].
Can you please repost the same ? I would like to test/review w.r.t PCC
driver.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230213232537.2040976-1-quic_eberman@quicinc.com/