Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7548C636CC for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233329AbjBOLxF (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 06:53:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51360 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233836AbjBOLxA (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 06:53:00 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72971279B6; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:52:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1676461979; x=1707997979; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sGItYsJPjXwrOlUwOMrgDww5mOK/F4dIR2AABpWT1BE=; b=izq8gw+eSjj99quXc3UTRRKmS8vU0brESKwy9HWYCFw6gxVojSljbEbh ms6KeUSlKySTmyiO//5be8TZ3xzi/vWG/oI38TIeE10zpOkQFhsuel0za sMNyF9KpbUv6K8uTUkVxJatB7JMgIcFANjR8OeCtlJ1GmC6mER+6pLfvX JzrWoValfCt7+4OlwQjh0jzYUlCCblAui+0qFqG2v5D0MHaCVdE+NNjbZ MtMDXSpHv8MN5HvXMkqs2BOeES1490JgJgXYya3LkqMtzs8zjubAcmddE F/mXD8nrXOvgK03eQ7PrjLmCE9kmRQ1a+pg2M6fMdEhoagSQ4afrisYfB A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10621"; a="417626846" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,299,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="417626846" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2023 03:52:58 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10621"; a="998462673" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,299,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="998462673" Received: from josefgel-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.251.213.167]) ([10.251.213.167]) by fmsmga005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2023 03:52:57 -0800 Message-ID: <05fb3949-d0aa-b653-d9a3-236a4c95a5a3@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:52:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: Question: partial transfers of DMABUFs Content-Language: en-US To: Paul Cercueil , Sumit Semwal , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= , Vinod Koul Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org References: <53ea4d2db570d3ca514a69015488bd5b849a5193.camel@crapouillou.net> <836d600a-bb1c-fbb2-89f5-7c79c3150e8c@linux.intel.com> From: Maarten Lankhorst In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey, On 2023-02-15 12:47, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Hi Maarten, > > Le mercredi 15 février 2023 à 12:30 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst a écrit : >> Hey, >> >> On 2023-02-15 11:48, Paul Cercueil wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am working on adding support for DMABUFs in the IIO subsystem. >>> >>> One thing we want there, is the ability to specify the number of >>> bytes >>> to transfer (while still defaulting to the DMABUF size). >>> >>> Since dma_buf_map_attachment() returns a sg_table, I basically have >>> two >>> options, and I can't decide which one is the best (or the less >>> ugly): >>> >>> - Either I add a new API function similar to >>> dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(), >>> which still takes a scatterlist as argument but also takes the >>> number >>> of bytes as argument; >>> >>> - Or I add a function to duplicate the scatterlist and then shrink >>> it >>> manually, which doesn't sound like a good idea either. >>> >>> What would be the recommended way? >> Does this need an api change? If you create a DMA-BUF of size X, it >> has >> to be of size X. You can pad with a dummy page probably if you know >> it >> in advance. But after it has been imported, it cannot change size. > Yes, the sizes are fixed. > >> You don´t have to write the entire dma-buf either, so if you want to >> create a 1GB buf and only use the first 4K, that is allowed. The >> contents of  the remainder of the DMA-BUF are undefined. It's up to >> userspace to assign a meaning to it. >> >> I think I'm missing something here that makes the whole question >> m,ake >> more sense. > I want my userspace to be able to specify how much of the DMABUF is to > be read from or written to. > > So in my new "dmabuf enqueue" IOCTL that I want to add to IIO, I added > a parameter to specify the number of bytes to transfer (where 0 means > the whole buffer). > > The problem I have now, is that the current dmaengine core does not > have a API function that takes a scatterlist (returned by > dma_map_attachment()) and a transfer size in bytes, it will always > transfer the whole scatterlist. > > So my two options would be to add a new API function to support > specifying a bytes count, or add a mechanism to duplicate a > scatterlist, so that I can tweak it to the right size. This doesn't have to happen through DMA-BUF. Presumably you are both the importer and the exporter, so after you know how much is read, you can tell this to the importer that X number of bytes can be read from DMA-BUF Y. In your case, when enqueing you will get a full SG list, but if you know only X bytes are read/written you only have to map the first X bytes to your IIO device. The rest of the SG list could be ignored safely. ~Maarten