Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA62C6379F for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232342AbjBOM3J (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:29:09 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48516 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229546AbjBOM3H (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:29:07 -0500 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e5ab]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B1B336446; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 04:29:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC18C6602193; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:29:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1676464143; bh=WN5KFfVxspp0n9FETRjSp4FseprWdAvg7PmlHOmIOx0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=OahlZnfc5QdgrlNeNrP8UDreZQCHyTo5ZWNrC9nQ6k9yY0AAt49dB7xNaPt+4r67d HGYr75yHOu1XEJDPUXheAilFVYXXKbPhjbjZ7MLQShoApbp5cpm879FUXacIwHyyNo KCDqVTOgKmsbmp45ETotMF+kaizptGg4NxDwyYU/vAuV2aopLm6XaTL4bsz/n4M2RU WzwsFkBHzr1+njff/cN+j537ftmgkfY9cVEd6Bo6wL7/bc8CzaGGD3QCAxPtKVAxbe SkROXRzR8YxCrJSCbbp3zwrmrOt8FlQuUjQ0uwPaGEqUWX1B5oYn2pjWdp4w8+0BBw YsqrOIcAR4fVw== Message-ID: <1fb45a25-38e9-d9cf-6c69-0ba0dac83824@collabora.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:29:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/12] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe multi-core SCP Content-Language: en-US To: Tinghan Shen , Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Matthias Brugger Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com References: <20230215041257.14548-1-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> <20230215041257.14548-8-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20230215041257.14548-8-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 15/02/23 05:12, Tinghan Shen ha scritto: > The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is > the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP > driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes > to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP. > > The resource structure of the multi-core SCP is a list of remoteproc > instances which is different to the single-core SCP. The corresponding > resource releasing action is based on the type of SCP. > > Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen > --- > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h | 4 + > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h > index 3778894c96f3..7821cb15d6fd 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h > @@ -140,6 +140,10 @@ struct mtk_scp { > size_t dram_size; > > struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev; > + > + struct list_head elem; > + struct list_head cluster_cores; > + struct list_head *cluster; I don't understand why you need both `cluster_cores` and `cluster`... check below. > }; > > /** > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > index 6270c388727a..6588e5acb159 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > @@ -862,7 +862,9 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp) > } > > static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > - struct mtk_scp_of_regs *of_regs) > + struct mtk_scp_of_regs *of_regs, > + const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data, > + bool is_multi_core) > { > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > @@ -883,7 +885,7 @@ static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > scp = (struct mtk_scp *)rproc->priv; > scp->rproc = rproc; > scp->dev = dev; > - scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); > + scp->data = of_data; > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp); > > scp->reg_base = of_regs->reg_base; > @@ -932,9 +934,11 @@ static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > goto remove_subdev; > } > > - ret = rproc_add(rproc); > - if (ret) > - goto remove_subdev; > + if (!is_multi_core) { > + ret = rproc_add(rproc); > + if (ret) > + goto remove_subdev; > + } > > return 0; > > @@ -950,9 +954,125 @@ static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > return ret; > } > > +static void scp_rproc_free(struct mtk_scp *scp) > +{ > + int i; > + > + scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp); > + scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT); > + scp_unmap_memory_region(scp); > + for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++) > + mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock); > + mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock); > +} > + > +static void scp_rproc_exit(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + rproc_del(scp->rproc); > + scp_rproc_free(scp); > +} > + > +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > + struct mtk_scp_of_regs *of_regs) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev); > + struct platform_device *cpdev; > + struct device_node *child; > + const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data; > + struct list_head *cluster; Here you have a local `cluster` pointer..... > + struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp; > + int core_id, num_cores; > + int ret; > + > + cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev); > + > + for (num_cores = 0; cluster_of_data[num_cores]; num_cores++) > + ; > + > + cluster = NULL; (unrelated: please initialize cluster and core_id on the declaration, not here) > + core_id = 0; > + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) { > + if (core_id >= num_cores) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > + dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id); > + of_node_put(child); > + goto init_fail; > + } > + > + cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child); > + if (!cpdev) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > + dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id); > + of_node_put(child); > + goto init_fail; > + } > + > + ret = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, of_regs, cluster_of_data[core_id], true); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id); > + put_device(&cpdev->dev); > + of_node_put(child); > + goto init_fail; > + } > + > + scp = platform_get_drvdata(cpdev); > + put_device(&cpdev->dev); > + if (core_id == 0) { > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp->cluster_cores); ...then here you initialize cluster_cores, > + cluster = &scp->cluster_cores; and assign to your local `cluster` pointer and even set it > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster); as platform drvdata. > + } > + > + list_add_tail(&scp->elem, cluster); Still using the local `cluster` pointer, which is `scp->cluster_cores` > + scp->cluster = cluster; ...and here, `scp->cluster` effectively points to local `cluster`, which is anyway `scp->cluster_cores`. As far as I understand, `scp->cluster` is EITHER `scp->cluster_cores` or NULL, hence the question: why do you need both scp->cluster and scp->cluster_cores, if they're always pointing to the same list? P.S.: I won't cut the rest of the patch so that the readers of this reply won't have to click around to see the whole code; comments end here! Regards, Angelo > + > + of_node_put(child); > + core_id++; > + } > + > + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) { > + ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc); > + if (ret) > + goto add_fail; > + } > + > + return 0; > + > +add_fail: > + list_for_each_entry_continue(scp, cluster, elem) { > + rproc_del(scp->rproc); > + } > +init_fail: > + if (cluster) { > + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) { > + list_del(&scp->elem); > + scp_rproc_free(scp); > + } > + } > + return ret; > +} > + > +static void scp_cluster_exit(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct list_head *cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + struct platform_device *cpdev; > + struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp; > + > + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) { > + list_del(&scp->elem); > + cpdev = to_platform_device(scp->dev); > + scp_rproc_exit(cpdev); > + } > +} > + > static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > + struct device_node *core_node; > struct resource *res; > struct mtk_scp_of_regs scp_regs; > int ret; > @@ -975,21 +1095,43 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > scp_regs.l1tcm_phys = res->start; > } > > - return scp_rproc_init(pdev, &scp_regs); > + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev); > + if (ret) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n"); > + > + core_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "scp"); > + of_node_put(core_node); > + > + if (!core_node) { > + dev_info(dev, "single-core scp\n"); > + > + ret = scp_rproc_init(pdev, &scp_regs, of_device_get_match_data(dev), false); > + if (ret) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to initialize single-core scp\n"); > + } else { > + dev_info(dev, "multi-core scp\n"); > + > + ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, &scp_regs); > + if (ret) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to initialize scp cluster\n"); > + } > + > + return 0; > } > > static int scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > - struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > - int i; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > + struct device_node *core_node; > > - rproc_del(scp->rproc); > - scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp); > - scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT); > - scp_unmap_memory_region(scp); > - for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++) > - mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock); > - mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock); > + core_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "scp"); > + of_node_put(core_node); > + > + if (!core_node) > + scp_rproc_exit(pdev); > + else > + scp_cluster_exit(pdev); > > return 0; > } > @@ -1068,12 +1210,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = { > .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT, > }; > > +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = { > + &mt8195_of_data, > + &mt8195_of_data_c1, > + NULL > +}; > + > static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data }, > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores }, > {}, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);