Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3328C636D4 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229513AbjBOPly (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:41:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60430 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229909AbjBOPlq (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:41:46 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D57543B0D6 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:41:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id l2so2959191wry.0 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:41:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vrull.eu; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hLvaMoa9MrI3Z7l2TQNfZp8HXv5vwrbeWjwMUNnrfB4=; b=heaaXyGJoKe/z2CXsf0Awel/ppDlB0AGgfmdPsTqgmB1lrLUi2i4H8qvST+LS267m4 Tfhx/QsWcKvEC6VyTtd6+x1RvFuCZa3ALpbi9X+ey2hWWmcfHFSuyNLQ/ilnwiSmLZOG 5WBHa4u0TRHOwH5JYQ2RMwjIVfZkfCqqdoKAPlnKpVNPt+qZ3KE3Kt2ZU+2PC/0VuC4+ 6m/wqRMs3NQ9EGscfSiRDgefDKPWwnHdRaGnow99/vEWThy0anzB9HY7N1ud3Rp/+TVv tsV5hR2mmCMdtHK5xqSmm2GU+XCPObAzm+/jmWobquYrwdt3+vQCMUvG2k7JXUBsI/tJ IeuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=hLvaMoa9MrI3Z7l2TQNfZp8HXv5vwrbeWjwMUNnrfB4=; b=J3cQwoY7Rx6wy581lsh0Qx8Woy+WxYjnecaKd8NvL7CwC/Sr1DiTa9GgByGVfDL8nG l3/ANY5qyJe1boP0qKLT6GvjFJhb7XHl5hpjZxrgBwDQugAI9Y5PrFobRA0JQcByWGpj B90LI57m3abgU2bxWQ2u7U+8h489sxTE+fSvLbP3OfDJk0QTymAY/UIDaCi40XmROTbi TlBVmDlJ03hyqhMR+TxbpCjd08rzh3zrETZVpg/ctwGHveOwZUWfAjblftFKc4vWdnSm bGikXSSGCst5Z/uSOxAyshcs7fIHUQQUCu5LO+bs1UsZTESfDHyKq17fLufNoTDO2B6r RrnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVNt8pnMR0gsMZGEGMBPJ5OIet+Z4TribeS1vwV5akBrfn8HYJg 6NadOGmC6GK8V7qD8XTOPLwG9mqvjHmbLxeU8Bp5Ew== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+b9/UowKKmxsgaPubC/BZ5DrJE7eXauwJzSkgN8VPP8Hkk1DrwXc+anhjALud5xSPlL3U86yuYqSjKTtJD6bU= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e3c7:0:b0:2c5:4dbd:e8ac with SMTP id k7-20020adfe3c7000000b002c54dbde8acmr59927wrm.120.1676475701345; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:41:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230128072737.2995881-3-apatel@ventanamicro.com> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Christoph_M=C3=BCllner?= Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 16:41:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] RISC-V: Detect AIA CSRs from ISA string To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: apatel@ventanamicro.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, atishp@atishpatra.org, Paul Walmsley , ajones@ventanamicro.com, anup@brainfault.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:25 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 23:27:32 PST (-0800), apatel@ventanamicro.com wrote: > > We have two extension names for AIA ISA support: Smaia (M-mode AIA CSRs) > > and Ssaia (S-mode AIA CSRs). > > This has pretty much the same problem that we had with the other > AIA-related ISA string patches, where there's that ambiguity with the > non-ratified chapters. IIRC when this came up in GCC the rough idea was > to try and document that we're going to interpret the standard ISA > strings that way, but now that we're doing custom ISA extensions it > seems saner to just define on here that removes the ambiguity. To avoid the impression that I did not work on that, here is the v2 from November, that attempts to document this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607326.html My proposed text was: +Note, that AIA support (@samp{Smaia} and @samp{Ssaia}) is based on an AIA +specification, which is frozen but contains draft chapters ("Duo-PLIC" and +"IOMMU Support"). Btw, I did not get any feedback on that patch. I also tried to address this on spec level (the PR has been linked) and raised that to tech-aia (the conversation has been linked). Another thing that I want to highlight, since it was discussed a lot recently (e.g. just a few minutes ago in tech-chairs). There is a chance of a last-minute spec change of AIA: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-aia/pull/37 BR Christoph > > > I just sent > > which documents that. > > > We extend the ISA string parsing to detect Smaia and Ssaia extensions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones > > --- > > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 2 ++ > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 2 ++ > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 ++ > > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > > index 86328e3acb02..341ef30a3718 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > > @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ enum riscv_isa_ext_id { > > RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE, > > RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC, > > RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL, > > + RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMAIA, > > + RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA, > > RISCV_ISA_EXT_ID_MAX > > }; > > static_assert(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ID_MAX <= RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX); > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c > > index 1b9a5a66e55a..a215ec929160 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c > > @@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ arch_initcall(riscv_cpuinfo_init); > > * extensions by an underscore. > > */ > > static struct riscv_isa_ext_data isa_ext_arr[] = { > > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMAIA), > > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ssaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA), > > This will conflict with that ISA string refactoring I just merged. It > should be a pretty mechanical merge conflict, but if you want we can do > a shared tag with the first few patches and I can handle the merge > conflict locally. > > > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF), > > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sstc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC), > > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL), > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > > index 93e45560af30..3c5b51f519d5 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > > @@ -228,6 +228,8 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void) > > SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zihintpause", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE); > > SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("sstc", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC); > > SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("svinval", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL); > > + SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("smaia", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMAIA); > > + SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("ssaia", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA); > > } > > #undef SET_ISA_EXT_MAP > > } > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv