Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 01:39:26 +0900
From:   Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
To:     Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Cc:     jchapman@katalix.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
        kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] l2tp: Avoid possible recursive deadlock in
 l2tp_tunnel_register()
Message-ID: <Y+0Kvspkx4n2tWJQ@kernel-devel>
References: <20230212162623.2301597-1-syoshida@redhat.com>
 <Y+pPXOqfrYkXPg1K@debian>
 <Y+u7hGIAxhvyDG/2@kernel-devel>
 <Y+vATfTKLogXw+Ki@debian>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y+vATfTKLogXw+Ki@debian>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Guillaume,

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 06:09:33PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:49:08AM +0900, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> > Just one more thing.  I created this patch based on the mainline linux
> > tree, but networking subsystem has own tree, net.  Is it preferable to
> > create a patch based on net tree for networking patches?
> 
> Yes. Networking fixes should be based on the "net" tree:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git

Thanks.  I'll use the "net" tree for v3 patch.

> For more details about posting patches to netdev, you can check
> Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
> 
> Or the online version:
> https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

Got it.  I'll check that.

Anyway, I'll make v3 patch based on your feedback.

Thanks,
Shigeru

> 
> > Thanks,
> > Shigeru
> > 
> > > 
> > 
>