Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD80C636CC for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 16:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229911AbjBOQ6k (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:58:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40048 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229881AbjBOQ6h (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:58:37 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com (mail-oi1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BDCD241DF; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:58:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id t5so16332126oiw.1; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:58:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=fnilHvHIWz6XJQyZmC9tlkle3V8Kd4Gf6vv7YdqxR7g=; b=W2Kij7HwOZ69SlA21yE20Tvu58qvFXHvnVOaM5wMJxICzaCiRi7MAhSTc5uXFU6AyL GXuGmGCM692bZQGW049nuPxarTmbm+jKeK6AxhQzA9pWj/HGYu6c5YEKx5x2iJZVRi+K LmiR6NrgBlhaAfQ9URxjdLD5+K1UayLoRCUsXx991qJbASL3xv8j1TYoBfGKC/fpR//U 6EbIon43DdWfXoGXHabvxaBFZhFVgpta5dHAAVBvcsRtPfX3lpz+QD463vQgnegwDpnX 2XV6HVe0D11wzQh79qMcsrth1C/tzDxIxggOArTMved0vFVyl7QDVR9h7UdrCaQUQgu8 le+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fnilHvHIWz6XJQyZmC9tlkle3V8Kd4Gf6vv7YdqxR7g=; b=fPA2p7oqwecfEU+4laagNzQZygTY5TIL3LkspWq8QFUOsK0b4e7nbk3pNXyZFLGta7 BLX1UmIME0fIOgCUWOapU4WEzNaMfPZ8jDIfhoAbsXrgffPnsD+sN2PokQPpQO3DT2se qdxSxc/PcIeQP9ZWM1OmXE3rtD1wMG3bx/IFk6LA89JzdFNnnI8QdcK6zEURKoYKzyKT K15YoClDjoUpcqNBos92nINzlVJGAF9giE+iSnPRfSYqEDC0vYDJpIaQ0Q4fET045WP0 hiIrJDkQZpZJIFUL8anqXJMUbv9JPh23w/cc85dGNdCaOp8EgwqLiHROiZzUXZviJbt0 0brQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVfpA59KG3cy9+xZ7+CGA536/49TF0DsH8WJlKprwTr4jy3fTpu t5dvi/cGYQdYUG2DCybaULY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/ZAvHpPaDMFMS7iXmCyOEZzy+JIZG9sfJMibCGco6yS7QrYlad8pI3tRcHIcvrjBqJLdJi8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:351:b0:364:8e7d:6afc with SMTP id j17-20020a056808035100b003648e7d6afcmr1098363oie.41.1676480314329; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:58:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s12-20020a9d758c000000b0068bc48c61a5sm7648978otk.19.2023.02.15.08.58.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:58:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:58:32 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Arnd Bergmann , Tony Luck , Jessica Clarke , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Matthew Wilcox , Marc Zyngier , Linus Torvalds , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture Message-ID: <20230215165832.GB3786546@roeck-us.net> References: <20230215100008.2565237-1-ardb@kernel.org> <20230215100008.2565237-2-ardb@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230215100008.2565237-2-ardb@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:00:04AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Itanium is the original architecture for which EFI was developed, and > the way Linux supports it deviates significantly from other > architectures. > > So it is anyone's guess whether the ongoing maintenance and developement > of the EFI subsystem has regressed Itanium or not - QEMU no longer > implements support for it, and so there is zero test coverage using > actual hardware. > > Note that the Intel firmware team themselves already removed all IA-64 > support from the Tianocore/EDK2 reference implementation of EFI in 2018, > so let's follow suit, and drop IA-64 from Linux as well. > > Acked-by: Tony Luck > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel Trying again since the previous message bounced with "message too long". Acked-by: Guenter Roeck Sorry for the noise for anyone receiving this twice. Guenter