Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC135C636D7 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229968AbjBOTrz (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:47:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41440 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229948AbjBOTri (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:47:38 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D95C841B54; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:46:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id eq11so25127007edb.6; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:46:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0gY6fPU2wIKz3O7JKb5l+ZOzMIrxO+gU/Fm6ycOW600=; b=CHXE1eU9oJnw19JirsAUnDO3tkBMRfy1btendDMBP5AvRrQ0274GX5pCHVg7IW85Xl Y0kqwtXxmIT3Vla8GB5aF5QlCVLGN9Y+j8vIsdXZ6xhhetLg/qhA7nrwF666eFQy/ZYJ 4N46YnXGiVfvZRwo1LP6ndb9jq0kCL1xXNTlK8feWZhgJxM46rkHNOCD1ZGUh4IgvE9g A7SE6tXe4M5bDAWr3LtRZRPlUv3/YDSTzjM4J8Au9ixcKNg9V7SNiGl/eTlPZkslqUg9 K6lwqBminK/H7J3SMiR7JkR7ybvL8GdZyVcqfAQz2diVErk4UGA5xOouUohCzwC+pwDr 767Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=0gY6fPU2wIKz3O7JKb5l+ZOzMIrxO+gU/Fm6ycOW600=; b=5EgudC5k3yDK17cxIV7a4ikUSPZ8oeRzR0iGcsSCj+EQz4lnVF0gNbg7gSs3Zz2qX3 7wugu7pnXguRhGpnMB2d1+y3uFWayrHOYDxdfxC0Ys6dKTV4y+IbG/gv2N49ffm+uSW3 OV5DGtNhIXVtV7iaJLfTliEh39uWN88CYhaVVzKeLRdEE91nkC+qhC23I2+rm5SCH989 BuGAcyRrY1v1OFe3p7lSULaIfRMy2+nEOM3SNYKbW2wBe7SFI0DiYWGt49bLbbG2skyn wojKEeSflT6ABJ+Su6jwReWbcFB/Hu2cazGwhrkDqvGpTfaYdZCUSpdWQ012GN/vrPWb 4rUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUyS9gLQt3Qy2KKM2DhdLF+Nr5nkIbGd70XUEdoQU/usFYdsqWe zQk8pSSMplde506lavYBLgOqCmhtjrK6XIhvJlrTQ8PI X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+5UINGYpxfOT+JqbbXrDGaMZhcao3eRocx2Q849cXbeJg5nU66qqezg0N3hP3F2iUPkmOt4fymeqb7uO0SUdE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:68b:b0:877:747d:1112 with SMTP id wn11-20020a170907068b00b00877747d1112mr1645959ejb.15.1676490388540; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:46:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230208101545.45711-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20230208101545.45711-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20230215192123.4ore7ac6tnedrsyq@ripper> In-Reply-To: <20230215192123.4ore7ac6tnedrsyq@ripper> From: Jassi Brar Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:46:17 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: drop mbox-names from example To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Andy Gross , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mathieu Poirier , Srinivas Kandagatla , Banajit Goswami , Mark Brown , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 1:19 PM Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 11:15:42AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Qualcomm G-Link RPM edge bindings do not allow and do not use mbox-names > > property. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > > --- > > > > Changes since v1: > > 1. None. > > 2. Previously was sent as separate patch. > > > > There are no strict dependencies. This can go anytime. The next patch > > (glink-rpm-edge) should be applied in the same or later cycle (could be > > via different trees). > > Jassi, I missed this note and merged the following patches, introducing > the forecasted issue in linux-next. To remedy this, I took the liberty > of merging this patch as well into the remoteproc tree. > No problem. Cheers.