Message-ID: <69bbe1ef-9ea9-b577-7660-c2997fa66f5c@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:34:49 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.2
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 02/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Supply clock from
 cpufreq node to CPUs
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        andersson@kernel.org
Cc:     robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org
References: <20230215070400.5901-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
 <20230215070400.5901-3-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230215070400.5901-3-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 15.02.2023 08:03, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Qualcomm platforms making use of CPUFreq HW Engine (EPSS/OSM) supply clocks
> to the CPU cores. But this relationship is not represented in DTS so far.
> 
> So let's make cpufreq node as the clock provider and CPU nodes as the
> consumers. The clock index for each CPU node is based on the frequency
> domain index.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index bdcb74925313..d9b6e028cdac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ CPU0: cpu@0 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0
>  					   &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1
> @@ -193,6 +194,7 @@ CPU1: cpu@100 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x100>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0
>  					   &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1
> @@ -214,6 +216,7 @@ CPU2: cpu@200 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x200>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0
>  					   &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1
> @@ -235,6 +238,7 @@ CPU3: cpu@300 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x300>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0
>  					   &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1
> @@ -256,6 +260,7 @@ CPU4: cpu@400 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x400>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0
>  					   &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1
> @@ -277,6 +282,7 @@ CPU5: cpu@500 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x500>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0
>  					   &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1
> @@ -298,6 +304,7 @@ CPU6: cpu@600 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x600>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0
>  					   &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1
> @@ -319,6 +326,7 @@ CPU7: cpu@700 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x700>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 2>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0
>  					   &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1
> @@ -5337,6 +5345,7 @@ cpufreq_hw: cpufreq@18591000 {
>  			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_GPLL0>;
>  			clock-names = "xo", "alternate";
>  			#freq-domain-cells = <1>;
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
>  		};
>  	};
>