Message-ID: <cb69610f-88df-5660-34f8-b1141d12ea15@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:39:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.2
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 10/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Supply clock
 from cpufreq node to CPUs
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        andersson@kernel.org
Cc:     robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org
References: <20230215070400.5901-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
 <20230215070400.5901-11-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230215070400.5901-11-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 15.02.2023 08:03, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Qualcomm platforms making use of CPUFreq HW Engine (EPSS/OSM) supply clocks
> to the CPU cores. But this relationship is not represented in DTS so far.
> 
> So let's make cpufreq node as the clock provider and CPU nodes as the
> consumers. The clock index for each CPU node is based on the frequency
> domain index.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> index 813fb168801f..a1eb9e333699 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CPU0: cpu@0 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			capacity-dmips-mhz = <602>;
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> @@ -69,6 +70,7 @@ CPU1: cpu@100 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x100>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			capacity-dmips-mhz = <602>;
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_100>;
> @@ -89,6 +91,7 @@ CPU2: cpu@200 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x200>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			capacity-dmips-mhz = <602>;
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_200>;
> @@ -109,6 +112,7 @@ CPU3: cpu@300 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x300>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			capacity-dmips-mhz = <602>;
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_300>;
> @@ -129,6 +133,7 @@ CPU4: cpu@400 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x400>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_400>;
> @@ -149,6 +154,7 @@ CPU5: cpu@500 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x500>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_500>;
> @@ -169,6 +175,7 @@ CPU6: cpu@600 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x600>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_600>;
> @@ -189,6 +196,7 @@ CPU7: cpu@700 {
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "qcom,kryo";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x700>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_700>;
> @@ -3875,6 +3883,7 @@ cpufreq_hw: cpufreq@18591000 {
>  			clock-names = "xo", "alternate";
>  
>  			#freq-domain-cells = <1>;
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
>  		};
>  
>  		remoteproc_nsp0: remoteproc@1b300000 {