Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] build system: section garbage collection for
	vmlinux
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20070907172425.GA12977@uranus.ravnborg.org>
References: <200709051443.21522.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
	 <200709061157.44080.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
	 <1189091630.8490.1.camel@imap.mvista.com>
	 <200709061807.33740.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
	 <1189182671.6303.42.camel@imap.mvista.com>
	 <20070907172425.GA12977@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:19:58 -0700
Message-Id: <1189185598.7636.4.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 987
Lines: 28

On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 19:24 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
> 
> > > I did that before I posted patches to lkml.
> > > IOW: posted patches are not broken versus module loading.
> > 
> > Ok, this is more like the explanation I was looking for..
> > 
> > During this thread you seemed to indicate the patches you release
> > reduced the kernel ~10% , but now your saying that was pre-release ,
> > right? 
> 
> What are you after here?
> 
> If you read the inital post you see the actual savings and you also
> can read that it works wiht modules. The precentage can be calculated
> from these numbers if you are interested.

Right, but he contradicted that during the course of this thread.. Which
is why I'm asking about it..

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/