Message-ID: <a4bfad9d-b9df-28a5-6bee-5cbbca4dd23f@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:07:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] PCI: samsung: Rename exynos_pcie to samsung_pcie
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com>, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
        kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
        jingoohan1@gmail.com, Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru,
        lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, hongxing.zhu@nxp.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        m.szyprowski@samsung.com, jh80.chung@samsung.co,
        pankaj.dubey@samsung.com
Cc:     linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230214121333.1837-1-shradha.t@samsung.com>
 <CGME20230214121436epcas5p1641de02220bea5edb23bc875b6311270@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
 <20230214121333.1837-9-shradha.t@samsung.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230214121333.1837-9-shradha.t@samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 14/02/2023 13:13, Shradha Todi wrote:
> The platform specific structure being used is named
> exynos_pcie. Changing it to samsung_pcie for making it
> generic.
> 
> Suggested-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-samsung.c | 190 +++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-samsung.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-samsung.c
> index d5adf1017a05..be0177fcd763 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-samsung.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
>  
>  #include "pcie-designware.h"
>  
> -#define to_exynos_pcie(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> +#define to_samsung_pcie(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>  
>  /* PCIe APPL registers */
>  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_IRQ_PULSE			0x000
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
>  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_APPL_SLV_ARMISC		0x120
>  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_APPL_SLV_DBI_ENABLE	BIT(21)
>  
> -struct exynos_pcie {
> +struct samsung_pcie {

No, I don't see benefit of this at all. How we call stuff inside driver
is not related whether this is for Tesla or Exynos. We could even call
it "pony". :) Thus renamings just to support new variant of Samsung
device is not a good reason.

Unless all of the old "exynos" names will be soon needed for some
exynos-specific variants?

Best regards,
Krzysztof