Message-ID: <a8f0cd74-6094-d24a-b126-ea7737e39a01@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:09:26 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] PCI: samsung: Rename common functions to samsung
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com>, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
        kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
        jingoohan1@gmail.com, Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru,
        lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, hongxing.zhu@nxp.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        m.szyprowski@samsung.com, jh80.chung@samsung.co,
        pankaj.dubey@samsung.com
Cc:     linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230214121333.1837-1-shradha.t@samsung.com>
 <CGME20230214121456epcas5p36603c8d717588699d1b5575229d19114@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
 <20230214121333.1837-14-shradha.t@samsung.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230214121333.1837-14-shradha.t@samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 14/02/2023 13:13, Shradha Todi wrote:
> Use samsung instead of exynos for all common functions
> like probe/remove/suspend/resume.
> 
> Suggested-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-samsung.c | 42 ++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-samsung.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-samsung.c
> index 719d284e1552..dc8ec0b546fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-samsung.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ struct samsung_pcie {
>  	struct regulator_bulk_data	supplies[2];
>  };
>  
> -static int exynos_pcie_init_clk_resources(struct samsung_pcie *sp)
> +static int samsung_pcie_init_clk_resources(struct samsung_pcie *sp)

Same as before - I don't see here benefit.

>  {
>  	struct device *dev = sp->pci.dev;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static int exynos_pcie_init_clk_resources(struct samsung_pcie *sp)
>  	return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(sp->clk_cnt, sp->clks);
>  }
>  

(...)

>  
> -static struct platform_driver exynos_pcie_driver = {
> -	.probe		= exynos_pcie_probe,
> -	.remove		= __exit_p(exynos_pcie_remove),
> +static struct platform_driver samsung_pcie_driver = {
> +	.probe		= samsung_pcie_probe,
> +	.remove		= __exit_p(samsung_pcie_remove),
>  	.driver = {
> -		.name	= "exynos-pcie",
> -		.of_match_table = exynos_pcie_of_match,
> -		.pm		= &exynos_pcie_pm_ops,
> +		.name	= "samsung-pcie",

This "name" has some point... but I think it would break now all module
users.

> +		.of_match_table = samsung_pcie_of_match,
> +		.pm		= &samsung_pcie_pm_ops,
>  	},
>  };
> -module_platform_driver(exynos_pcie_driver);
> +module_platform_driver(samsung_pcie_driver);
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos_pcie_of_match);
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, samsung_pcie_of_match);

Best regards,
Krzysztof