Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:42:17 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
        Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@intel.com>, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] [PULL REQUEST] iommu/vt-d: Fixes for v6.2-rc8
Message-ID: <Y+4yuaciYYnptpKI@8bytes.org>
References: <20230216130816.151824-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230216130816.151824-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Baolu,

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:08:12PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Below iommu/vt-d fixes are queued for your fixes branch.
> 
> - Two performance optimizations
> - Fix PASID directory pointer coherency
> - Fix missed rollbacks in error path
> 
> Please consider it for the iommu/fixes branch.

So nothing of this seems really critical (e.g. fixes a regression that a
number of people are encountering). Especially the performance
optimizations do not qualify as fixes at this stage of the cycle. I will
queue them in the VT-d branch so that they go upstream in the next merge
window, unless you convince me otherwise.

Regards,

	Joerg