Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0255DC636D6 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229709AbjBQVRk (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:17:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229461AbjBQVRi (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:17:38 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB4F964B17 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:17:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1676668621; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=U58nb+DEF8GEy813UGwea6K+4QQ4/Qwsx/KnDbNVFig=; b=Lz56krSXrg/brGm6oXNssibFJ7XBl+G02Y+OU+spoFg50XSvv1uP+RwzkIfNPCHUTFTRGR DnJvOj5avnLmovQXQh4fZm/3ZwoVigd2dV6VTi+2a18EMC8eFyKTmZJn8NTj86GbbzY2k3 7+rle/E81QhYy9Jd53C1QrPF4icDzIk= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-640-CF_ujmaLOvCX2kcLbvELXg-1; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:16:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: CF_ujmaLOvCX2kcLbvELXg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 577CF1871D94; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.33.36.24]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CA71121314; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <87a61ckowk.fsf@oc8242746057.ibm.com> References: <87a61ckowk.fsf@oc8242746057.ibm.com> To: Alexander Egorenkov Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, david@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org, hch@lst.de, hdanton@sina.com, jack@suse.cz, jgg@nvidia.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, jlayton@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, logang@deltatee.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, willy@infradead.org, Marc Hartmayer Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 08/17] splice: Do splice read from a file without using ITER_PIPE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <654864.1676668613.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:16:53 +0000 Message-ID: <654865.1676668613@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Egorenkov wrote: > Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 08/17] splice: Do splice read from a file without > using ITER_PIPE Well, I can reproduce it. Putting a printks in generic_file_splice_read(), direct_splice_read() and filemap_splice_read(), however, seems to show that it isn't using any of those functions; nor can I see any sign of a splice syscall in a strace:-/ David