Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE077C64ED6 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 01:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229597AbjBRByq (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2023 20:54:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51836 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229445AbjBRByo (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2023 20:54:44 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 975444E5DD; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 17:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id eg30so10710758edb.7; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 17:54:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jA/ugla+5i3dvnVJILyKOQpQ6/ozSYeGNQWjzA1fUcA=; b=Jl7E5N3V1vg5Xe2YqsP/thAqBUxWlyKbRgU6XLTJmBlNxmKf2N39tTCplYEkCYpEDW a4qPuwdhu8FXMD6azl6e4eiKhd+XL/pAzh/4FsdstR4OaaxCQrGn+Ay+Ldp4yeFW+eFR PH+QvNqcNsBa2fIGML33zFJkOlcvpH4XoZbAksyiaEIxlzIEKxBYZKi1Iv2lf4AJwAmh GDqrAYkeL2zj/2cdb+7VzrIl9wK45GsV0zQwu/ogyKQalVMXJwohivT1KSCAohJX6XLk sKElerHEsgQxP7Sx553FIi+QMLkZHBwgV76rSkvGUrPGg9/JgMjIjgrTN3uppgp7LRY/ 4gJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jA/ugla+5i3dvnVJILyKOQpQ6/ozSYeGNQWjzA1fUcA=; b=VmY0Am+YN8ScOwra05oe4CuNikvvrvAUDNDXsHd7ApMkY1jJLqVe+dp/qtCI+RDQAI +N+grKjfPHEz6TZAfAeAkJKFU27/0oELhiHTSrB9PtzOxtWyEzOm68tlBIuEkJFhVyW6 MOIgz6eaxcjgz3gqurVv66u/MG1MAu9ps/4+x6fq0zirgGYNtiQcLpwe5gr88f378gHu A0trSpto6TCm8roHmXve+1xTzvKXGdR67XSot2giDBwu/VVK63zJtI5TD1X0pTkR+QwK ekTIdEy+ERg31LCAMXBxOG3koO7uTNsT8mzVebdDPD8b9cnqhJ0DjYD8aBTav/+vjboJ 9SoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWjEzHWT+kjJQMenmIcNEAmKwRH7Lj2pAnoUlAups7ZWPPA/Du/ 5IEiVbtVsjBZgz1VlTWb37C0HsP5o9bAj8e1hf4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/WC7LwCEzh+T+AtiNzLawBQqjdCYYN4L2e9XBfPS0ry61w+AaRFfsW28sFUqOCoj/H0XltNn8biQDp4J5EdnU= X-Received: by 2002:a50:9f4f:0:b0:4ac:b618:7fb1 with SMTP id b73-20020a509f4f000000b004acb6187fb1mr1779765edf.6.1676685280999; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 17:54:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230214121333.1837-1-shradha.t@samsung.com> <20230214121333.1837-2-shradha.t@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: From: Han Jingoo Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 17:54:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] dt-bindings: PCI: Rename Exynos PCIe binding to Samsung PCIe To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Shradha Todi , lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, hongxing.zhu@nxp.com, tglx@linutronix.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, jh80.chung@samsung.co, pankaj.dubey@samsung.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 14/02/2023 13:13, Shradha Todi wrote: > > The current DT bindings is being used for Exynos5433 SoC only. > > In order to extend this binding for all SoCs manufactured by > > Samsung using DWC PCIe controller, renaming this file to a more > > generic name. > > Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi > > --- > > .../pci/{samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml => samsung,pcie.yaml} | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/{samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml => samsung,pcie.yaml} (93%) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,pcie.yaml > > similarity index 93% > > rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml > > rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,pcie.yaml > > index f20ed7e709f7..6cd36d9ccba0 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,pcie.yaml > > We keep the name rather tied to compatible, not generic. There are no > other compatibles here, so I don't think we should rename it. I also agree with Krzysztof Kozlowski's opinion. For renaming, we should have strong valid reasons. Best regards, Jingoo Han > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >