Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0929C636D7 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 08:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229758AbjBRIFm (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2023 03:05:42 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50502 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229489AbjBRIFk (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2023 03:05:40 -0500 Received: from nautica.notk.org (ipv6.notk.org [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:7a93::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B939241F1; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:05:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id 0D381C009; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 09:06:02 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1676707562; bh=OAFcUBrsFSt/oLsR9EX7XJPu+XPQ3u8XJHEt8p0SO6k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BHd8YQX7F8Yb5vCd7Wz0fW+8gJYl0yPKGqWXeRSBmxrHzvCWMYCynq+HmxjibxaSq CV/eZIjxmlmOskC0qyM+4ppyoxHlvTnL+Mk4RxHAv/8WqGDJtRN58qhrnwGHJ8sqme ULClBf0mySrEau33jjTAweqRdxHPUUJMx50BGA4NxOHWluWruPNI2QkkZBCrgzeyev FLpBxB4RfvC9aLGZDuAsCjEEUA+PcOjfmb2JF5+KvrXc8SUZ09yjsp/y0A+rTmYueZ brZhlzYfnlFhSlLX55I92b8z0HsEPQEHa+z+rWXUqa9stwD65y72MsVpSPN8GTlHT/ /V9XWUNA+YfKQ== Received: from odin.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nautica.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53958C009; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 09:05:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1676707561; bh=OAFcUBrsFSt/oLsR9EX7XJPu+XPQ3u8XJHEt8p0SO6k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=t4o7yZ0dQS0w/9C742EN6EZy3polnQtnWPv3DhkBLu2PWmWTPxvhXV6CYW+ZIKYQb NMbERoFfPK3EXtTFk/TfePHaKmJCP6liTcAC9BFCDLd1GB9VPjJJiUPcxk4VsXO45p QVvwvAi/PckB3N58LuzcOH7zR9qsb1TIh9qU9SYq8IEOH5TcJL5ZoaIEUTtF9nFDCc sbwG+dvkVa2iMX/LGoB0ng1c6hrqpb/lHI0LnfJWd94IBRaKhFLTWdwm2jXvO8mFVa rMfywRxcUD9mdfwm6PfGha0TxXZpANhmjO96P4GbCzumjfQb90K7bd+TQco2dF6wx5 3Ej7embvrv59Q== Received: from localhost (odin.codewreck.org [local]) by odin.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id fb6f5d93; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 08:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 17:05:17 +0900 From: asmadeus@codewreck.org To: Eric Van Hensbergen Cc: v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, rminnich@gmail.com, lucho@ionkov.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux_oss@crudebyte.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/11] 9p: Add additional debug flags and open modes Message-ID: References: <20230124023834.106339-1-ericvh@kernel.org> <20230218003323.2322580-1-ericvh@kernel.org> <20230218003323.2322580-8-ericvh@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230218003323.2322580-8-ericvh@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric Van Hensbergen wrote on Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:33:19AM +0000: > Add some additional debug flags to assist with debugging > cache changes. Also add some additional open modes so we > can track cache state in fids more directly. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen New debug flags can't hurt. For open modes: don't we send the mode verbatim to servers? won't they be confused? I guess I'll see in the next patch if you trim it down, but we might want to add a P9_MODE_MASK or something with values we're allowed to send and have client.c filter it out? -- Dominique