Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27E5C64ED6 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 11:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229509AbjBRLRR (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2023 06:17:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52756 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229436AbjBRLRP (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2023 06:17:15 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C19ED1B334; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 03:17:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E72060A05; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 11:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBC75C433EF; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 11:17:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1676719033; bh=MBpW+wS6kJjM9nw/RX4T/6lVEQz7JAtQyjKM0xZ3B+g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RbCF8rxLVhB+zqGRt9Y85P0PTJ2aOqfqKaNuekrrAE8pdZY1DEN6tfgBbSozPG08i uLE/Z4IlY8Xm89vjqDdVvdAeigbQGvCKq1bzTbxy+vQ1KvJ4cDbUY843nJd9yOKBLa aCAMgekEnGtWT+s5V2eR0/VUKcnRNfJxs905kkDVTJwvncsCu10mxEBRa8puviTSrT +XvUrr7SCjxlsPvL2iYkfGqbNq8TULVBOlD+1ZjWvLoyTBuCndbogYtwXKRU2n2qXM 0eJqB9JeLzVMGD104WB0SvLA8b7i65q2NU5CR5rXD13YUWMfqnb7LgeHb9T8Wq/n0W /ZbIfRiDiOnbw== Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 11:17:08 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Conor Dooley , Hal Feng , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette , Philipp Zabel , Emil Renner Berthing , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add StarFive JH7110 system clock and reset generator Message-ID: References: <5cf0fe71-fd17-fb28-c01e-28356081ba76@starfivetech.com> <68e61f28-daec-ce72-726a-1fffe8e94829@starfivetech.com> <41e4f293-99eb-f157-b4a9-3d00b15f4652@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PuWXwRc8It3YJ8xy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41e4f293-99eb-f157-b4a9-3d00b15f4652@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --PuWXwRc8It3YJ8xy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Krzysztof, On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 11:20:30AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 17/02/2023 17:27, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 04:47:48PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 17/02/2023 14:32, Conor Dooley wrote: > >>>>>> Yes, it is. > >>>>> > >>>>> Which would then make GMAC1 RGMII RX optional, rather than required? > >>>> > >>>> If thinking in this way, I must say yes, it is optional. But actually > >>>> GMAC1 RGMII RX feeds gmac1_rx by default.=20 > >>>> For a mux, it usually works if you populate only one input to it. > >>>> Does it mean all the other inputs are optional? And how can we define > >>>> which input is required? > >>> > >>> I'm not sure, that is a question for Krzysztof and/or Rob. > >> > >> That's a long thread, please summarize what you ask. Otherwise I have = no > >> clue what is the question. > >=20 > > Sorry. I tried to preserve the context of the conversation the last time > > I cropped it so that things would be contained on one email. > >=20 > > For me at least, I am wondering how you convey that out of a list of > > clock inputs (for example a, b, c, d) that two of the clocks are inputs > > to a mux and it is only required to provide one of the two (say b & c). You skipped this part which was what I was trying to ask you about. Do you know how to convey this situation, or is it even possible to express those rules? > >> Does the mux works correctly if clock input is not connected? I mean, > >> are you now talking about real hardware or some simplification from SW > >> point of view? > >=20 > > I'm coming at this from an angle of "is a StarFive customer going to sh= ow > > up with a devicetree containing dummy fixed-clocks to satisfy dtbs_check > > because they opted to only populate one input to the mux". > > I don't really care about implications for the driver, just about > > whether the hardware allows for inputs to the mux to be left > > un-populated. >=20 > Whether hardware allows - not a question to me. > BTW, this is rather question coming from me... I don't understand what you mean by this, sorry. Thanks, Conor. --PuWXwRc8It3YJ8xy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCY/CztAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0jg/AP4wInRGlkOUh1Al9iKc09rdNcx7Y9+jOgeM4wKt33DlgQEA+4tSZw88zO0/ a6YhAFGSsTVeN3Rx2Dki8r642zgv0wk= =XpKK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PuWXwRc8It3YJ8xy--