Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B595C678DB for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 13:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232137AbjBTNmk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:42:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52262 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232170AbjBTNme (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:42:34 -0500 Received: from mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.168.131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D69B1D90D; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 05:42:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0279865.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 31K6ZMVF028228; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 13:42:05 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=qcppdkim1; bh=3RWo/VGRg+v2FNa6JJL7OoXML1PZm142obMtM76O3J4=; b=KOPX6BNyjBCfGC+90Dn+4iZn/pFu+9AJYX/Dxk/mGePVRO7Ue1bEWSZrO6HlkesfevC8 QwnB7OxoYfLePCiR3u2rPS3HL+gPig32YFeeKMeZUEcifhu8HHkyGm2ylQGeDoNA/FZU mgCgohZtzhPgDvRU1wq+EG/9oggmJXBxesiruovh9Oe6a87kUTZ/w6prMD+4Nh77z5GH WZ2T3OBBNAqn2CDGtdXLZkB6y6ipxL4OOxhOFSsLiNYilm5nT+2jEGJ9oVwtwPrE1bVz l4g50a3Sb0miy9fVNfIcyxa1MSF/qBjQlTpc66uTh4VWKC2bAUGvGia12Vwn74rqvzGo pQ== Received: from nalasppmta05.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ntnn05219-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 13:42:05 +0000 Received: from nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.209.196]) by NALASPPMTA05.qualcomm.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 31KDg47c021527 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 13:42:04 GMT Received: from [10.216.11.20] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.41; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 05:41:55 -0800 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:11:52 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] PCI: qcom: Add IPQ9574 PCIe support Content-Language: en-US To: Sricharan Ramabadhran , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , References: <20230214164135.17039-1-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com> <20230214164135.17039-3-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com> <6ea43d8d-7b9c-5a11-097f-906e10ac3627@quicinc.com> From: Devi Priya In-Reply-To: <6ea43d8d-7b9c-5a11-097f-906e10ac3627@quicinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: RTn0JSJl0gq1xjJmiXK-RMMRyT3xAFLt X-Proofpoint-GUID: RTn0JSJl0gq1xjJmiXK-RMMRyT3xAFLt X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-02-20_11,2023-02-20_02,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2302200125 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sri, Thanks for taking time to review the patch! On 2/16/2023 5:08 PM, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote: > Hi Devi, > > On 2/14/2023 10:11 PM, Devi Priya wrote: >> Adding PCIe support for IPQ9574 SoC >> >> Co-developed-by: Anusha Rao >> Signed-off-by: Anusha Rao >> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya >> --- >>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>   1 file changed, 119 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >> index a232b04af048..57606c113d45 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >> @@ -193,6 +193,12 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 { >>       struct reset_control *rst; >>   }; >> +struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_27_0 { >> +    struct clk_bulk_data *clks; >> +    struct reset_control *rst; >> +    int num_clks; >> +}; >> + >>   union qcom_pcie_resources { >>       struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_0_0 v1_0_0; >>       struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 v2_1_0; >> @@ -201,6 +207,7 @@ union qcom_pcie_resources { >>       struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_4_0 v2_4_0; >>       struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 v2_7_0; >>       struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 v2_9_0; >> +    struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_27_0 v1_27_0; >>   }; >>   struct qcom_pcie; >> @@ -1409,6 +1416,104 @@ static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct >> qcom_pcie *pcie) >>       return 0; >>   } >> +static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) >> +{ >> +    struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_27_0 *res = &pcie->res.v1_27_0; >> +    struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci; >> +    struct device *dev = pci->dev; >> + >> +    res->num_clks = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &res->clks); >> +    if (res->clks < 0) >> +        return res->num_clks; >> + >> +    res->rst = devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive(dev); >> +    if (IS_ERR(res->rst)) >> +        return PTR_ERR(res->rst); >> + >> +    return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static void qcom_pcie_deinit_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) >> +{ >> +    struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_27_0 *res = &pcie->res.v1_27_0; >> + >> +    clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(res->num_clks, res->clks); >> +} >> + >> +static int qcom_pcie_init_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) >> +{ >> +    struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_27_0 *res = &pcie->res.v1_27_0; >> +    struct device *dev = pcie->pci->dev; >> +    int ret; >> + >> +    ret = reset_control_assert(res->rst); >> +    if (ret) { >> +        dev_err(dev, "reset assert failed (%d)\n", ret); >> +        return ret; >> +    } >> + >> +    /* >> +     * Delay periods before and after reset deassert are working values >> +     * from downstream Codeaurora kernel >> +     */ >> +    usleep_range(2000, 2500); >> + >> +    ret = reset_control_deassert(res->rst); >> +    if (ret) { >> +        dev_err(dev, "reset deassert failed (%d)\n", ret); >> +        return ret; >> +    } >> + >> +    usleep_range(2000, 2500); >> + >> +    return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(res->num_clks, res->clks); >> +} >> + >> +static int qcom_pcie_post_init_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) >> +{ >> +    struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci; >> +    u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); >> +    u32 val; >> +    int i; >> + >> +    writel(0x8000000, pcie->parf + PCIE20_v3_PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE); >> + >> +    val = readl(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL); >> +    val &= ~BIT(0); >> +    writel(val, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL); >> + >> +    writel(0, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_DBI_BASE_ADDR); >> + >> +    writel(DEVICE_TYPE_RC, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_DEVICE_TYPE); >> +    writel(BYPASS | MSTR_AXI_CLK_EN | AHB_CLK_EN, >> +           pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_MHI_CLOCK_RESET_CTRL); >> +    writel(GEN3_RELATED_OFF_RXEQ_RGRDLESS_RXTS | >> +           GEN3_RELATED_OFF_GEN3_ZRXDC_NONCOMPL, >> +           pci->dbi_base + GEN3_RELATED_OFF); >> + >> +    writel(MST_WAKEUP_EN | SLV_WAKEUP_EN | MSTR_ACLK_CGC_DIS | >> +           SLV_ACLK_CGC_DIS | CORE_CLK_CGC_DIS | >> +           AUX_PWR_DET | L23_CLK_RMV_DIS | L1_CLK_RMV_DIS, >> +           pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_SYS_CTRL); >> + >> +    writel(0, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_Q2A_FLUSH); >> + >> +    dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); >> +    writel(PCIE_CAP_SLOT_VAL, pci->dbi_base + offset + PCI_EXP_SLTCAP); >> + >> +    val = readl(pci->dbi_base + offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP); >> +    val &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_ASPMS; >> +    writel(val, pci->dbi_base + offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP); >> + >> +    writel(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_COMP_TMOUT_DIS, pci->dbi_base + offset + >> +           PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2); >> + >> +    for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) >> +        writel(0, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_BDF_TO_SID_TABLE_N + (4 * >> i)); >> + >> +    return 0; >> +} >> + >>   static int qcom_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) >>   { >>       u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); >> @@ -1620,6 +1725,15 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_2_9_0 = { >>       .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable, >>   }; >> +/* Qcom IP rev.: 1.27.0 Synopsys IP rev.: 5.80a */ >> +static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_1_27_0 = { >> +    .get_resources = qcom_pcie_get_resources_1_27_0, >> +    .init = qcom_pcie_init_1_27_0, >> +    .post_init = qcom_pcie_post_init_1_27_0, >> +    .deinit = qcom_pcie_deinit_1_27_0, >> +    .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable, >> +}; >> + >>   static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_1_0_0 = { >>       .ops = &ops_1_0_0, >>   }; >> @@ -1652,6 +1766,10 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_2_9_0 = { >>       .ops = &ops_2_9_0, >>   }; >> +static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_1_27_0 = { >> +    .ops = &ops_1_27_0, >> +}; >> + >>   static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { >>       .link_up = qcom_pcie_link_up, >>       .start_link = qcom_pcie_start_link, >> @@ -1829,6 +1947,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id >> qcom_pcie_match[] = { >>       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2", .data = &cfg_2_1_0 }, >>       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074", .data = &cfg_2_3_3 }, >>       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3", .data = &cfg_2_9_0 }, >> +    { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq9574", .data = &cfg_1_27_0 }, > >   I do not see much difference between 2_9_0 and 1_27_0. Is this patch >   really required. Can you check if it works with 2_9_0 itself ? Yes right Sri, Only the clocks seem to differ between 2_9_0 and 1_27_0. Will update 2_9_0 ops to get the clocks from the DT and use the same for ipq9574 in the next spin. Best Regards, Devi Priya > > Regards, >  Sricharan