Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:52:28 +0000
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, kernel@pengutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: phy: EEE fixes
Message-ID: <Y/SUXDlB6TlBbZMI@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20230221050334.578012-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
 <Y/SQo20Qes2GpoeM@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <20230221094809.GF19238@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230221094809.GF19238@pengutronix.de>
Sender: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:48:09AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 09:36:35AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 06:03:30AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > changes v2:
> > > - restore previous ethtool set logic for the case where advertisements
> > >   are not provided by user space.
> > 
> > I don't think the _kernel_ should be doing this - this introduces a
> > different behaviour to the kernel. As I already said, setting the
> > default advertisement in the case of ethtool -s is done by userspace
> > not by the kernel.
> > 
> > In fact, the kernel explicitly rejects an attempt to have autoneg
> > enabled with a zero advertising mask:
> > 
> >         linkmode_copy(advertising, cmd->link_modes.advertising);
> >         linkmode_and(advertising, advertising, phydev->supported);
> >         if (autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE && linkmode_empty(advertising))
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > and I think we should have a uniform behaviour with the same API,
> > rather than different behaviours, as that becomes quite messy.
> 
> I decided to revert this part to not mix different issue. This logic
> existed before my refactoring. So, it is better to handle it as
> different patch. Current patch set should address only regressions.

Okay, let's keep it like that then. Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!