Message-ID: <0c1eaa274b2ef6d63f9f0897024974309a375b4b.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: phy: EEE fixes
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2023 12:52:48 +0100
In-Reply-To: <feb4388052a3f55a869704f204faa7ad39aeff1d.camel@redhat.com>
References: <20230221050334.578012-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
         <feb4388052a3f55a869704f204faa7ad39aeff1d.camel@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 12:45 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 06:03 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > changes v2:
> > - restore previous ethtool set logic for the case where advertisements
> >   are not provided by user space.
> > - use ethtool_convert_legacy_u32_to_link_mode() where possible
> > - genphy_c45_an_config_eee_aneg(): move adv initialization in to the if
> >   scope.
> >=20
> > Different EEE related fixes.
> >=20
> > Oleksij Rempel (4):
> >   net: phy: c45: use "supported_eee" instead of supported for access
> >     validation
> >   net: phy: c45: add genphy_c45_an_config_eee_aneg() function
> >   net: phy: do not force EEE support
> >   net: phy: c45: genphy_c45_ethtool_set_eee: validate EEE link modes
> >=20
> >  drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c    | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 21 +++++++++++++-
> >  include/linux/phy.h          |  6 ++++
> >  3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >=20
> # Form letter - net-next is closed
>=20
> The merge window for v6.3 has begun and therefore net-next is closed
> for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations.
> We are currently accepting bug fixes only.
>=20
> Please repost when net-next reopens after Mar 6th.
>=20
> RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.

It looks like I was a little too hasty here; these are fixes for code
currently only on net-next. As such you can re-post (for -net) after
that Linus's net-next pull and subsequent merge into -net.

Thanks,

Paolo