Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D3FC61DA3 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234219AbjBUO5l (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:57:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48626 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230164AbjBUO5j (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:57:39 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C70532916A; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 06:57:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id j3so1516252wms.2; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 06:57:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4H9Mx/yKZ3Hus53qi2wHVToOwmIjYjSCkNX7dVFqCwo=; b=F2QVHq2MCLZT2G5xJA114eev7sGqCMrd7Io0D+KtpUjacTeZhDiQ9UixCwB1qbmptO dWnBgzBbqEDLMGlhxBVmRgj7IcKcxRD39kHShMHrEzeXoYAo6wN4RKpKig9W6tqtNUTt 2UbDIjuwX5Tir3Q305RwQWwA5koLQAa4CMCpx3jKvGwFwHrPU6USlvVujdgJqP0DD4cK VGB9Wk3iQV0WEmmPfqzCXdRAturixbDMT+U6x/0iH5nMDlSt0utdeASuG3ox7jX1RS+Q WDqrHMWdipE2fhrI/Ku9CuzS8nE1ggzLRNisrzLwkqYWgoYo1w9KF8LfgwEjWY9O6+4x DP1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=4H9Mx/yKZ3Hus53qi2wHVToOwmIjYjSCkNX7dVFqCwo=; b=rOQ+xAE/koDaQHA48JCgv9iCvgFXyUebbt/wqXwh1WCCE/+NbVe65YxyORGtFviexU mzP7gTg72hmmnj0A5YAk+FIRtOVe6vIg2jZz2Xi6vN4UGPKJpuifXwM5y47xGgP5CLrW qJ2KS3MIs5lFC7IfqLzn8AXRAdzKYSEXgE/AhgiET5Ypnum3Ym5WWK5PWkdACefMCh/I CkTGpuE5U+Iejic+ockI+radKZQqF4fImFKSloDxBj0g0XpNYUnwvm15TNxnvemfK3oK 2Zt1MsDX0o3iylhgzpQ1zPtsAwM2aOyHW/uTR+l3cKCHiqmCtwSmmBDBlidpLMxg3NyR whSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWhfJrlAFwOi1StIT7vGhPEYiMqaZGA7IYAho4fYIxHkFtCr8Gm psc1McjxHm4HF4GhjPbiAkI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/tts7I2v794GNeEU0xjDE4f5TUNTMY6f68NtdjKBIJ0UWaYFSZ0sj6Q7mjoYHCqSjqfrEI4g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b11:b0:3e2:669:757 with SMTP id m17-20020a05600c3b1100b003e206690757mr3471234wms.10.1676991457308; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 06:57:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r18-20020a05600c459200b003dc433355aasm4595702wmo.18.2023.02.21.06.57.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 06:57:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:57:35 +0000 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/83] 5.15.95-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230220133553.669025851@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230220133553.669025851@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 02:35:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.95 release. > There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:35:35 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230210): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2907 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2910 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2912 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip