Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49582C636D7 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234391AbjBUPBG (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:01:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52516 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234603AbjBUPBB (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:01:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7499C2B61F; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 07:00:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id o4so4761692wrs.4; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 07:00:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bOHnaqumSzvCkeAdCi/JvKB/RmaESjli5/JpvR7XJaQ=; b=TJRIv4K9Y005WXgOmnzBfsBi7OZwRev7SsWnoqIIMZI33gso2oXRcs0dYcOwFnWHdH N0mY6OOkGZypHI36Fcn24ElYS1uvVSKQk2MiemFhUArVR/2TDjaY5FJtoC2QdZ2mjyl8 MImTvpNTk4pqSFb5dV+VmXiBOQ58urpu6ufQ+O0piYHURbkLX/EPMPEhw4buag9z/6mM fTb33CbMcYcemO+6KsNc5uGyxHC59jorV4xcgJTtY4kIxpaldWM+QesELmndD4eYcHuU EMIdwUTC9q/l0xnBPPpD16ajIwZKb7U22twdSgzDkteJuif4LUbPoAqzoCkzzgGeeOFN jAbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=bOHnaqumSzvCkeAdCi/JvKB/RmaESjli5/JpvR7XJaQ=; b=egBaA8k6DAhCKsv8aOuXXwxeiWFBuZd+tRJRS2XbQaAa0c2DliDq0efrY6j3VB93kX JQ9coGVSHo0etRiq1Qzx1UY/hW9zcTZ250prqqTvHlT6mb9SE4sAzhDgAHVlg2uLYmgE FJxchepjRT5G1cyr3b/H4DJIpw77KTHNEpK/VuZ89MsAmmVDj5Lw+swBBaxu+wq3A0kh xbcpseUx4Dh0r9Eu4akRsQxQx2LKrjQm7cHfobKmVM2n7UpT+2H+ozBEhPGtrmIkvcZh 2qBwJtKvUE2UBrUYSU0QbYejMRpTG85Lb4/7m5OW/B9a1bdDthtt9FaRpkj6vuRXMocW lUNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXwj2aNH9VPb+47UuXlHW9E7y/c4CHNLRHgJmJA6aW5WEYDJPjd /VLrVa3rTRaX1dfa7aT2D2I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8fOwARuarbsrKvPo0bsg1/oz8pvXlTOLIEu/dsO0MVjoWl03a9N2+ebT9YQI6DQ59mNfAErg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:110d:b0:2c5:5d18:4311 with SMTP id z13-20020a056000110d00b002c55d184311mr4537306wrw.21.1676991656918; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 07:00:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d18-20020a5d6452000000b002c54f4d0f71sm6098316wrw.38.2023.02.21.07.00.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 07:00:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:00:54 +0000 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/156] 5.4.232-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230220133602.515342638@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230220133602.515342638@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 02:34:04PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.232 release. > There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:35:35 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230210): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2905 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip