Message-ID: <8a002459-37aa-47c2-4e7d-50adac6015f6@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:13:44 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 7/8] soundwire: amd: handle SoundWire wake enable
 interrupt
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>, vkoul@kernel.org
Cc:     alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com,
        Mario.Limonciello@amd.com, Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com,
        Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com, Mastan.Katragadda@amd.com,
        Arungopal.kondaveeti@amd.com,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
        Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20230220100418.76754-1-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
 <20230220100418.76754-8-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230220100418.76754-8-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 2/20/23 05:04, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
> Add wake enable interrupt support for both the SoundWire manager
> instances.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mastan Katragadda <Mastan.Katragadda@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> index 3322adeca0d8..a7182aa78652 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> @@ -932,6 +932,13 @@ static void amd_sdw_update_slave_status(u32 status_change_0to7, u32 status_chang
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void amd_sdw_process_wake_event(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager)
> +{
> +	pm_request_resume(amd_manager->dev);

is this needed?

In the Intel case, the wakes do not necessarily come as in-band wakes,
but they can also be notified by the PCI subsystem, so we do have to use
pm_request_resume.

In the AMD case, what happens if you don't do this? Doesn't the
interrupt trigger a pm_runtime_resume already?

> +	acp_reg_writel(0x00, amd_manager->acp_mmio + ACP_SW_WAKE_EN(amd_manager->instance));
> +	acp_reg_writel(0x00, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_STATE_CHANGE_STATUS_8TO11);
> +}
\