MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230221120612.27366-1-r-gunasekaran@ti.com> <20230221120612.27366-2-r-gunasekaran@ti.com>
 <fa789c44-d9b9-92a6-00f4-7bc2410c7642@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <fa789c44-d9b9-92a6-00f4-7bc2410c7642@ti.com>
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:04:13 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKcktHkexxPaneZjaUt=XwLA_5ypZxSZKnX5TozdgJ+Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: ti,j721e-system-controller: Fix
 mux node regex
To:     Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@ti.com>
Cc:     nm@ti.com, afd@ti.com, kristo@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, s-vadapalli@ti.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 8:00 AM Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> wrote:
> On 21/02/23 5:36 pm, Ravi Gunasekaran wrote:
> > mux-controller nodes may not have "reg" property. Update the regex
> > for such nodes to resolve the dtbs warnings
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@ti.com>
> > ---

Where's the change history? I doubt I ignored the last 9 versions...

> >  .../bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml          | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml
> > index 76ef4352e13c..532bfa45e6a0 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml
> > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ properties:
> >
> >  patternProperties:
> >    # Optional children
> > -  "^mux-controller@[0-9a-f]+$":
> > +  "^mux-controller(@|-)[0-9a-f]+$":
>
> Hmm. mmio-mux bindings allow reg property. Why can't we add the same to
> mux-controller node in 2/9 ?

Yes, do that.

Rob