Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2023 20:57:26 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        pjt@google.com, evn@google.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
        peterz@infradead.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
        kim.phillips@amd.com, alexandre.chartre@oracle.com,
        daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com, corbet@lwn.net, bp@suse.de,
        linyujun809@huawei.com, jmattson@google.com,
        =?utf-8?B?Sm9zw6k=?= Oliveira <joseloliveira11@gmail.com>,
        Rodrigo Branco <rodrigo@kernelhacking.com>,
        Alexandra Sandulescu <aesa@google.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/speculation: Allow enabling STIBP with legacy
 IBRS
Message-ID: <Y/UiJmv7j12hOe0k@zn.tnic>
References: <20230221184908.2349578-1-kpsingh@kernel.org>
 <Y/UbqiHQ2/aczPzg@kroah.com>
 <CACYkzJ7pLhJ+NfUq36PaMxadkgv-cPtO60TW=g_Nh7vU1vEWqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y/Uf2lnU/VcsFs1O@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y/Uf2lnU/VcsFs1O@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 08:47:38PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> Why does anyone need to "drop stable" from a patch discussion?  That's
> not a problem, we _WANT_ to see the patch review and discussion also
> copied there to be aware of what is coming down the pipeline.  So
> whomever said that is not correct, sorry.

Someone dropped stable because you used to send automated formletter
mails that this is not how one should submit a patch to stable. I guess
that is not needed anymore so I'll stop dropping stable.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette