Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C626CC61DA3 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 21:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229558AbjBUVjt (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:39:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42758 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229514AbjBUVjr (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:39:47 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 347C01BF for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:39:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1677015586; x=1708551586; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=qx2ux9NU/p8ll9E2OClo1BDR13NgTibqUdG12UXfylw=; b=BOt7Ab7d0xmW6U3nTTeHgIJ3hXUgn4gvoAWGg4zW+f5ClWJLuCMJdb66 GaMp2iCCrm3j893/3TjepUux7MaRpvlGzS/PvdT5r7cegXzVRd1a4wS0B eIuCm9tbfwZht5RbM9tR4uC028slzaqXh544Ucny8GEhjWMYucAzxAbVd KFQZsxXo+Ia6co5HJWZqkCkbwKE/iRssjhgjrPSY36gNPQNCzUo3vDKNs YkVs11SM0C3rOt1yKDYDeHW8JSYeBIdROY+596bz5ig8yIwneVk8ir61n XQwdUVSZY+b0tehsOv8zQZBjk8wiGrt8vzsrgEI69/eCl/0ALBR4PSEkQ w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10628"; a="330486172" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,317,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="330486172" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Feb 2023 13:39:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10628"; a="702163008" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,317,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="702163008" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.70]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 21 Feb 2023 13:39:41 -0800 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 23:39:40 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 23:39:40 +0200 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: Rob Clark Cc: Pekka Paalanen , Rob Clark , Thomas Zimmermann , Tvrtko Ursulin , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Michel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= , open list , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Rodrigo Vivi , Alex Deucher , freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/14] drm/vblank: Add helper to get next vblank time Message-ID: References: <20230218211608.1630586-1-robdclark@gmail.com> <20230218211608.1630586-11-robdclark@gmail.com> <20230220110820.595cfa37@eldfell> <20230221104551.60d44d1c@eldfell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Patchwork-Hint: comment Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:54:55AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 5:01 AM Ville Syrj?l? > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:45:51AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:55:41 -0800 > > > Rob Clark wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 1:08 AM Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 13:15:53 -0800 > > > > > Rob Clark wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > From: Rob Clark > > > > > > > > > > > > Will be used in the next commit to set a deadline on fences that an > > > > > > atomic update is waiting on. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark > > > > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > include/drm/drm_vblank.h | 1 + > > > > > > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c > > > > > > index 2ff31717a3de..caf25ebb34c5 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c > > > > > > @@ -980,6 +980,38 @@ u64 drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > > > > > } > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time); > > > > > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > > > + * drm_crtc_next_vblank_time - calculate the time of the next vblank > > > > > > + * @crtc: the crtc for which to calculate next vblank time > > > > > > + * @vblanktime: pointer to time to receive the next vblank timestamp. > > > > > > + * > > > > > > + * Calculate the expected time of the next vblank based on time of previous > > > > > > + * vblank and frame duration > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > for VRR this targets the highest frame rate possible for the current > > > > > VRR mode, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is based on vblank->framedur_ns which is in turn based on > > > > mode->crtc_clock. Presumably for VRR that ends up being a maximum? > > > > > > I don't know. :-) > > > > At least for i915 this will give you the maximum frame > > duration. > > > > Also this does not calculate the the start of vblank, it > > calculates the start of active video. > > AFAIU, vsync_end/vsync_start are in units of line, so I could do something like: > > vsync_lines = vblank->hwmode.vsync_end - vblank->hwmode.vsync_start; > vsyncdur = ns_to_ktime(vblank->linedur_ns * vsync_lines); > framedur = ns_to_ktime(vblank->framedur_ns); > *vblanktime = ktime_add(*vblanktime, ktime_sub(framedur, vsyncdur)); Something like this should work: vblank_start = framedur_ns * crtc_vblank_start / crtc_vtotal deadline = vblanktime + vblank_start That would be the expected time when the next start of vblank happens. -- Ville Syrj?l? Intel