Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C0EC64EC4 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 21:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230142AbjBUVsO (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:48:14 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50890 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229581AbjBUVsM (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:48:12 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D506515CAB for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:48:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1677016090; x=1708552090; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=4HDSVe2cjaHzxh13lU3SRWv0R26BXpO/dpA9ELNQQ3c=; b=VxvVBy3QtOCtqbvSpwtEqAQ/mnfSgeiuGdOmyNPsdFHcxWbYKzOTNAOi TljuVPJWPVXISBHVpdzHtYbdWc9uZFVWSv/ullcEsbGc5puESVbQ3pSZz Ry4O+4gt3r/UiGksrUhSOOPUxpBizKBedz/f24iqXTudtOGtnrBPHw4ZP UPCcJWVY2hHFLV25inaVrTf5JMChah5Jcl+UR/uLDBCDFvtJ7lSOAuiQP g7+RtDinrlXMt2GktwybxEvsP2sGBqsqRm3uMfT6rBe4WrEMGNog6G7eV +NQ3KF0hJSHkcMgNAaKTFNZ0PCway3EVr3YK4v+mCmIhjtebNAUgdm52K w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10628"; a="332765046" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,317,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="332765046" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Feb 2023 13:48:10 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10628"; a="702165082" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,317,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="702165082" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.70]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 21 Feb 2023 13:48:06 -0800 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 23:48:05 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 23:48:05 +0200 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: Rob Clark Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Michel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, open list , Pekka Paalanen , Thomas Zimmermann , Rodrigo Vivi , Alex Deucher , freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/14] drm/vblank: Add helper to get next vblank time Message-ID: References: <20230218211608.1630586-1-robdclark@gmail.com> <20230218211608.1630586-11-robdclark@gmail.com> <20230220110820.595cfa37@eldfell> <20230221104551.60d44d1c@eldfell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Patchwork-Hint: comment Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:39:40PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:54:55AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 5:01 AM Ville Syrj?l? > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:45:51AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:55:41 -0800 > > > > Rob Clark wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 1:08 AM Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 13:15:53 -0800 > > > > > > Rob Clark wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Rob Clark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will be used in the next commit to set a deadline on fences that an > > > > > > > atomic update is waiting on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > include/drm/drm_vblank.h | 1 + > > > > > > > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c > > > > > > > index 2ff31717a3de..caf25ebb34c5 100644 > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c > > > > > > > @@ -980,6 +980,38 @@ u64 drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > > > > + * drm_crtc_next_vblank_time - calculate the time of the next vblank > > > > > > > + * @crtc: the crtc for which to calculate next vblank time > > > > > > > + * @vblanktime: pointer to time to receive the next vblank timestamp. > > > > > > > + * > > > > > > > + * Calculate the expected time of the next vblank based on time of previous > > > > > > > + * vblank and frame duration > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > for VRR this targets the highest frame rate possible for the current > > > > > > VRR mode, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is based on vblank->framedur_ns which is in turn based on > > > > > mode->crtc_clock. Presumably for VRR that ends up being a maximum? > > > > > > > > I don't know. :-) > > > > > > At least for i915 this will give you the maximum frame > > > duration. > > > > > > Also this does not calculate the the start of vblank, it > > > calculates the start of active video. > > > > AFAIU, vsync_end/vsync_start are in units of line, so I could do something like: > > > > vsync_lines = vblank->hwmode.vsync_end - vblank->hwmode.vsync_start; > > vsyncdur = ns_to_ktime(vblank->linedur_ns * vsync_lines); > > framedur = ns_to_ktime(vblank->framedur_ns); > > *vblanktime = ktime_add(*vblanktime, ktime_sub(framedur, vsyncdur)); > > Something like this should work: > vblank_start = framedur_ns * crtc_vblank_start / crtc_vtotal > deadline = vblanktime + vblank_start > > That would be the expected time when the next start of vblank > happens. Except that drm_vblank_count_and_time() will give you the last sampled timestamp, which may be long ago in the past. Would need to add an _accurate version of that if we want to be guaranteed a fresh sample. -- Ville Syrj?l? Intel