Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEE6C64ED6 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 23:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230289AbjBUXZq (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 18:25:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45206 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229963AbjBUXZo (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 18:25:44 -0500 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.188.207]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07A030291; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:25:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 00:25:34 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Pavel Tikhomirov Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@openvz.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix percpu counter block leak on error path when creating new netns Message-ID: References: <20230213042505.334898-1-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230213042505.334898-1-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:25:05PM +0800, Pavel Tikhomirov wrote: > Here is the stack where we allocate percpu counter block: > > +-< __alloc_percpu > +-< xt_percpu_counter_alloc > +-< find_check_entry # {arp,ip,ip6}_tables.c > +-< translate_table > > And it can be leaked on this code path: > > +-> ip6t_register_table > +-> translate_table # allocates percpu counter block > +-> xt_register_table # fails > > there is no freeing of the counter block on xt_register_table fail. > Note: xt_percpu_counter_free should be called to free it like we do in > do_replace through cleanup_entry helper (or in __ip6t_unregister_table). > > Probability of hitting this error path is low AFAICS (xt_register_table > can only return ENOMEM here, as it is not replacing anything, as we are > creating new netns, and it is hard to imagine that all previous > allocations succeeded and after that one in xt_register_table failed). > But it's worth fixing even the rare leak. Any suggestion as Fixes: tag here? This issue seems to be rather old?