Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C531AC61DA4 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 15:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232471AbjBVP34 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:29:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48262 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232377AbjBVP3z (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:29:55 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C1586A72 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 07:29:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id f13so31406243edz.6 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 07:29:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YRpTGuARTRBMn36r7tlXq3qs+CoLxHqb66PgbsuqrJE=; b=aFfhi1Q8liHmCDttqXt4BsRE4pKOyZ0BsLYT1rHW4sAf2cDnZaVnaOcNi9Srhgcri4 2weua2b9PjnHvF7A69aGjDs61at2sWlxZmigpK+jmJ4eCpM7a7WEeWr+XpLtekbFlpbZ wRsPek9Mr2Mh4aACdHW4f4dYR9reJpqp5g2cvHoquprU9j2kexlgxVaQLFxX0aPfDcJ/ xMs3kLPlD6FGyc3s412vZaYpD2CCj1M4dXX7kW28PTf1/pEVmY66qa0XpVEqfzrfeqbr MM00XJKfXUwonXSrZZNSoc1vDYVIQKUK8Cgw8EeZLsxrZVDuYVUSQ9F6Pdv0lPPvT1Fo EAkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YRpTGuARTRBMn36r7tlXq3qs+CoLxHqb66PgbsuqrJE=; b=NKkppYZvgTQv/25jpsUe28Ld6g6Cit7LJ9C/i+E6nzf2lSdkJWAGZphDs2nbNgv0AN ETDAxzoX3eY9yUZIswpHOd9e8X8/uRneyWBxZvOhP5+QuZ6lSIMKYPK/svBDfw9OqNmg yK7R6vdfQh0IBSeqrCLnn0ldw7BZQRhQtCybMXez9aL2+b1kJQcVXwrZVISKUal1n73r kTVpQWkppxn+4/eZnmCJEVFGnT1wn93iEO7ic1UlLiyl1gIsdCOaSfbMsQOSWEgAHgMA rjOXdNjIcgQRxtiLeX1U1xUP8OkK9uQTiAjjzwuUv6lGKvD8ltEka8SXoijhdyADVkia Pqdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXIar/+W5UtfBH+8PE29JRt6SZL9/rkaS1WRZJBKNTA0jdMPP9r PAnHKkGF3UOymZC6cI4nnsWgYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8PzT2qWIgKTOfPggUjC00P2pwJYwx3QVR25wRd+rFFsKXlbkH/ugDvhVjFizuu6pcEOnFeaQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c054:0:b0:4ae:f496:f32 with SMTP id k20-20020aa7c054000000b004aef4960f32mr10274813edo.26.1677079791760; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 07:29:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.109] ([82.77.80.204]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c23-20020a50f617000000b004acde0a1ae5sm3650529edn.89.2023.02.22.07.29.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Feb 2023 07:29:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <68ed0578-f4e9-250d-9742-cbb7815b1d61@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 15:29:49 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix another off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems Content-Language: en-US From: Tudor Ambarus To: "Darrick J. Wong" , Theodore Ts'o Cc: Jun Nie , adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones References: <5da85766-65c7-107f-e525-2ae75b04750a@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <5da85766-65c7-107f-e525-2ae75b04750a@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Darrick, On 2/17/23 08:10, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > Hi, Darrick, > > On 2/16/23 18:55, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >> From: Darrick J. Wong >> >> Apparently syzbot figured out that issuing this FSMAP call: >> >> struct fsmap_head cmd = { >>     .fmh_count    = ...; >>     .fmh_keys    = { >>         { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, >>         { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, >>     }, >> ... >> }; >> ret = ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_GETFSMAP, &cmd); >> >> Produces this crash if the underlying filesystem is a 1k-block ext4 >> filesystem: >> >> kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3331! >> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP >> CPU: 3 PID: 3227965 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G        W  O >> 6.2.0-rc8-achx >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 >> 04/01/2014 >> RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp+0x47c/0x570 [ext4] >> RSP: 0018:ffffc90007c03998 EFLAGS: 00010246 >> RAX: ffff888004978000 RBX: ffffc90007c03a20 RCX: ffff888041618000 >> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000005a4 RDI: ffffffffa0c99b11 >> RBP: ffff888012330000 R08: ffffffffa0c2b7d0 R09: 0000000000000400 >> R10: ffffc90007c03950 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 >> R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000c40 R15: ffff88802678c398 >> FS:  00007fdf2020c880(0000) GS:ffff88807e100000(0000) >> knlGS:0000000000000000 >> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >> CR2: 00007ffd318a5fe8 CR3: 000000007f80f001 CR4: 00000000001706e0 >> Call Trace: >>   >>   ext4_mballoc_query_range+0x4b/0x210 [ext4 >> dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] >>   ext4_getfsmap_datadev+0x713/0x890 [ext4 >> dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] >>   ext4_getfsmap+0x2b7/0x330 [ext4 >> dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] >>   ext4_ioc_getfsmap+0x153/0x2b0 [ext4 >> dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] >>   __ext4_ioctl+0x2a7/0x17e0 [ext4 >> dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] >>   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xa0 >>   do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x80 >>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 >> RIP: 0033:0x7fdf20558aff >> RSP: 002b:00007ffd318a9e30 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 >> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000200c0 RCX: 00007fdf20558aff >> RDX: 00007fdf1feb2010 RSI: 00000000c0c0583b RDI: 0000000000000003 >> RBP: 00005625c0634be0 R08: 00005625c0634c40 R09: 0000000000000001 >> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fdf1feb2010 >> R13: 00005625be70d994 R14: 0000000000000800 R15: 0000000000000000 >> >> For GETFSMAP calls, the caller selects a physical block device by >> writing its block number into fsmap_head.fmh_keys[01].fmr_device. >> To query mappings for a subrange of the device, the starting byte of the >> range is written to fsmap_head.fmh_keys[0].fmr_physical and the last >> byte of the range goes in fsmap_head.fmh_keys[1].fmr_physical. >> >> IOWs, to query what mappings overlap with bytes 3-14 of /dev/sda, you'd >> set the inputs as follows: >> >>     fmh_keys[0] = { .fmr_device = major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 3}, >>     fmh_keys[1] = { .fmr_device = major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 14}, >> >> Which would return you whatever is mapped in the 12 bytes starting at >> physical offset 3. >> >> The crash is due to insufficient range validation of keys[1] in >> ext4_getfsmap_datadev.  On 1k-block filesystems, block 0 is not part of >> the filesystem, which means that s_first_data_block is nonzero. >> ext4_get_group_no_and_offset subtracts this quantity from the blocknr >> argument before cracking it into a group number and a block number >> within a group.  IOWs, block group 0 spans blocks 1-8192 (1-based) >> instead of 0-8191 (0-based) like what happens with larger blocksizes. >> >> The net result of this encoding is that blocknr < s_first_data_block is >> not a valid input to this function.  The end_fsb variable is set from >> the keys that are copied from userspace, which means that in the above >> example, its value is zero.  That leads to an underflow here: >> >>     blocknr = blocknr - le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block); >> >> The division then operates on -1: >> >>     offset = do_div(blocknr, EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)) >> >>         EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_bits; >> >> Leaving an impossibly large group number (2^32-1) in blocknr. >> ext4_getfsmap_check_keys checked that keys[0].fmr_physical and >> keys[1].fmr_physical are in increasing order, but >> ext4_getfsmap_datadev adjusts keys[0].fmr_physical to be at least >> s_first_data_block.  This implies that we have to check it again after >> the adjustment, which is the piece that I forgot. >> >> Fixes: 4a4956249dac ("ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block >> filesystems") >> Link: >> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=79d5768e9bfe362911ac1a5057a36fc6b5c30002 >> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong >> --- >>   fs/ext4/fsmap.c |    2 ++ >>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsmap.c b/fs/ext4/fsmap.c >> index 4493ef0c715e..cdf9bfe10137 100644 >> --- a/fs/ext4/fsmap.c >> +++ b/fs/ext4/fsmap.c >> @@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct >> super_block *sb, >>           keys[0].fmr_physical = bofs; >>       if (keys[1].fmr_physical >= eofs) >>           keys[1].fmr_physical = eofs - 1; >> +    if (keys[1].fmr_physical < keys[0].fmr_physical) >> +        return 0; > > This is an indirect implication, we can be more straightforward. Also we > should stop the execution when high_key->fmr_physical == bofs. So maybe: > > --- a/fs/ext4/fsmap.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/fsmap.c > @@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct super_block > *sb, >         int error = 0; > >         bofs = le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block); > +       if (keys[1].fmr_physical <= bofs) > +               return 0; >         eofs = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es); >         if (keys[0].fmr_physical >= eofs) >                 return 0; Just wanted to let you know that I sent this patch together with two others at: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20230222131211.3898066-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org/T/ Cheers, ta