From:   =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] nvmem: core: add per-cell post processing
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2023 18:22:42 +0100
Message-Id: <20230222172245.6313-2-zajec5@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230222172245.6313-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
References: <20230222172245.6313-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>

Instead of relying on the name the consumer is using for the cell, like
it is done for the nvmem .cell_post_process configuration parameter,
provide a per-cell post processing hook. This can then be populated by
the NVMEM provider (or the NVMEM layout) when adding the cell.

Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/nvmem/core.c           | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/nvmem-provider.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 6783cd8478d7..c5c9a4654241 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell_entry {
 	int			bytes;
 	int			bit_offset;
 	int			nbits;
+	nvmem_cell_post_process_t read_post_process;
 	struct device_node	*np;
 	struct nvmem_device	*nvmem;
 	struct list_head	node;
@@ -465,6 +466,7 @@ static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry_nodup(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
 	cell->offset = info->offset;
 	cell->bytes = info->bytes;
 	cell->name = info->name;
+	cell->read_post_process = info->read_post_process;
 
 	cell->bit_offset = info->bit_offset;
 	cell->nbits = info->nbits;
@@ -1429,6 +1431,13 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
 	if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits)
 		nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf);
 
+	if (cell->read_post_process) {
+		rc = cell->read_post_process(nvmem->priv, id, index,
+					     cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
+		if (rc)
+			return rc;
+	}
+
 	if (nvmem->cell_post_process) {
 		rc = nvmem->cell_post_process(nvmem->priv, id, index,
 					      cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
@@ -1537,6 +1546,14 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_entry_write(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell, void *buf, si
 	    (cell->bit_offset == 0 && len != cell->bytes))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/*
+	 * Any cells which have a read_post_process hook are read-only because
+	 * we cannot reverse the operation and it might affect other cells,
+	 * too.
+	 */
+	if (cell->read_post_process)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits) {
 		buf = nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(cell, buf, len);
 		if (IS_ERR(buf))
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index b3c14ce87a65..f87fd64eee8f 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ struct nvmem_keepout {
  * @bit_offset:	Bit offset if cell is smaller than a byte.
  * @nbits:	Number of bits.
  * @np:		Optional device_node pointer.
+ * @read_post_process:	Callback for optional post processing of cell data
+ *			on reads.
  */
 struct nvmem_cell_info {
 	const char		*name;
@@ -62,6 +64,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell_info {
 	unsigned int		bit_offset;
 	unsigned int		nbits;
 	struct device_node	*np;
+	nvmem_cell_post_process_t read_post_process;
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.34.1