Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2023 12:59:37 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huawei.com>,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        Paul =?iso-8859-1?Q?Heidekr=FCger?= <paul.heidekrueger@in.tum.de>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/memory-model: Add details about SRCU read-side
 critical sections
Message-ID: <20230222205937.GU2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <20230213015506.778246-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <Y/JS5SYKPeeDQErL@rowland.harvard.edu>
 <CAEXW_YQrFSiDEM9cuhkTT2_1+CZoGbg7vC9oL-D-Wd5OQ2mm2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEXW_YR6eKDCv+E8Xv2aX=Eo=H0667cqrXkMqKhc_QMZ4Vf59A@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y/PgxRorDQZ7wPKU@rowland.harvard.edu>
 <20230222195051.GT2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
 <Y/Z7zIGNUIxymLRO@rowland.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y/Z7zIGNUIxymLRO@rowland.harvard.edu>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 03:32:12PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:50:51AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 04:06:13PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:13:14PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:11 PM Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> > > > > Even though it may be redundant: would it be possible to also mention
> > > > > (after this paragraph) that this case forms an undesirable "->rf" link
> > > > > between B and C, which then causes us to link A and D as a result?
> > > > >
> > > > > A[srcu-lock] ->data B[once] ->rf C[once] ->data D[srcu-unlock].
> > > > 
> > > > Apologies, I meant here, care must be taken to avoid:
> > > > 
> > > > A[srcu-lock] ->data B[srcu-unlock] ->rf C[srcu-lock] ->data D[srcu-unlock].
> > > 
> > > Revised patch below.  I changed more than just this bit.  Mostly small 
> > > edits to improve readability, but I did add a little additional 
> > > material.
> > 
> > Looks good to me, thank you!
> > 
> > Would you like to send a formal patch, or are you thinking in terms
> > of making other changes first?
> 
> I'll send a formal patch when I find time to write an appropriate 
> Changelog description.
> 
> I also have in mind making other changes along the lines Joel suggested, 
> but they will be separate patches.

Sounds good!

							Thanx, Paul