MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230223083932.0272906f@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20230223083932.0272906f@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:46:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJHdD4gZ_EbYb4e=eTfwS0JQEdsJrUqe1010SPv3bzkgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the bpf tree
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>,
        bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 1:39 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
>   345d24a91c79 ("bpf: Include missing nospec.h to avoid build error.")
>
> This is commit
>
>   f3dd0c53370e ("bpf: add missing header file include")
>
> in Linus' tree.

Yes. I just dropped it from bpf tree.

FYI we also added it to BPF CI's special folder for patches
that CI applies before it runs.
So it's no longer an issue for BPF CI though commit f3dd0c53370e
didn't make it into bpf trees yet.
All good.