From:   Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com>
To:     seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        hpa@zytor.com
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM/x86: fix comment that should be user fault
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2023 22:21:30 +0800
Message-Id: <20230223142130.2338972-1-quanfafu@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

The content of comment should be user fault not read. In order to avoid
confusion, fix the comment.

Signed-off-by: Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 7eec0226d56a..3c1012039517 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -5668,7 +5668,7 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	gpa = vmcs_read64(GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
 	trace_kvm_page_fault(vcpu, gpa, exit_qualification);
 
-	/* Is it a read fault? */
+	/* Is it a user fault? */
 	error_code = (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_READ)
 		     ? PFERR_USER_MASK : 0;
 	/* Is it a write fault? */
-- 
2.31.1